Re: terminology (was: [DISCUSSION] Incubating proposal of Kvrocks)

2022-04-26 Thread Greg Stein
Oh, sure. That totally works! On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 10:14 PM tison wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Thanks for pointing that out. Is "5 IPMC members" correct also? "5 members > of the IPMC" is a bit wordy, though. > > Best, > tison. > > > Greg Stein 于2022年4月27日周三 10:52写道: > > > I have a problem with the

Re: terminology (was: [DISCUSSION] Incubating proposal of Kvrocks)

2022-04-26 Thread tison
Hi Greg, Thanks for pointing that out. Is "5 IPMC members" correct also? "5 members of the IPMC" is a bit wordy, though. Best, tison. Greg Stein 于2022年4月27日周三 10:52写道: > I have a problem with the terminology some people are using: > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 10:28 PM tison wrote: > >... > >

terminology (was: [DISCUSSION] Incubating proposal of Kvrocks)

2022-04-26 Thread Greg Stein
I have a problem with the terminology some people are using: On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 10:28 PM tison wrote: >... > 3. The proposal wants to run this podling with 5 IPMCs, There is ONLY ONE IPMC. aka the Incubator Project Management Committee. ONE. IPMC refers to the committee. The use of "IP