How is pluto.jar licensed?
Richard Jacob wrote:
dims wrote:
#1 - The code for wsrp4j that we will get will have everything needed for
WSRP4J to work in a
Tomcat/Servlet Container...Right?
right
#2 - Later the JSR 168 reference impl may/can be extracted into a separate
project...Right?
yes, it
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
> #2 - I was a bit surprised that this note about Charon to incubator did not
> come from either me or sam.
sam asked me.
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Millennium
#1 - "-1 on the apparent process on how this "arrived"". Where EXACTLY is this process
documented ("how/when should someone send a note to incubator about a project
to get the
ball rolling")
#2 - I was a bit surprised that this note about Charon to incubator did not come from
either me
Status update:
- Started the VOTE on WS-PMC. Will report back the results.
- There's Portlet API jar (named pluto.jar) that is required by both Charon and
Jetspeed-2. The
Jetspeed-2 folks are working on it
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed-dev&m=105949774325419&w=2).
Questions:
- Is avai
Greg Stein wrote:
>
> So how exactly was this projected "accepted"? I see zero discussion before
> Ken's post to [EMAIL PROTECTED] That seems *very* inappropriate.
it hasn't been accepted, at least not by the incubator. oh,
you mean the sponsoring project. all i can say is what i was told
by sa
Richard,
Bottom-line:
#1 - The code for wsrp4j that we will get will have everything needed for WSRP4J to
work in a
Tomcat/Servlet Container...Right?
#2 - Later the JSR 168 reference impl may/can be extracted into a separate
project...Right?
Thanks,
dims
--- Richard Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 11:55:13AM -0400, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote:
>...
> > I'm also a -1 on the apparent process on how this "arrived" at the
> > Incubator.
>
> miscommunication, is all. i assumed from what i was told that
> everything was done and the actual incubation
On 1/08/2003 19:09 Davanum Srinivas wrote:
- There's Portlet API jar (named pluto.jar) that is required by both Charon and Jetspeed-2. The
Jetspeed-2 folks are working on it
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed-dev&m=105949774325419&w=2).
Questions:
- Is availability of pluto.jar file a Sho
On 8/1/2003 10:09 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Status update:
- Started the VOTE on WS-PMC. Will report back the results.
- There's Portlet API jar (named pluto.jar) that is required by both Charon and Jetspeed-2. The
Jetspeed-2 folks are working on it
(http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed-dev&
dims wrote:
>#1 - The code for wsrp4j that we will get will have everything needed for
WSRP4J to work in a
>Tomcat/Servlet Container...Right?
right
>#2 - Later the JSR 168 reference impl may/can be extracted into a separate
project...Right?
yes, it will be the pluto project. Currently there is no
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 05:52:17AM -0700, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> #1 - "-1 on the apparent process on how this "arrived"". Where EXACTLY is this
> process
> documented ("how/when should someone send a note to incubator about a
> project to get the
> ball rolling")
I was referring to t
first off all sorry if I break the thread, but I subscibed a few minutes
ago.
Let me try to bring light into the wsrp4j proposal confusion:
We intend to donate two projects: pluto and wsrp4j (formally named charon).
pluto is the JSR168 (Portlet spec) reference implementation, wrsp4j is the
implemen
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
> FYI, AFAIK Charon depends on JSR168 Impl - jetspeed2 (code
> checked in just a few days ago -
> http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-jetspeed-2/). So we should
> not have a problem.
>
I thought the JSR 168 Impl is the Pluto proposal
(http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/ap
13 matches
Mail list logo
