yep or no default url and a url in the CI profile. Will take care of that
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:43 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On the site url and as Martijn mentioned I also think this is a NON-issue
>>
>> Can't one provide the URL as a c
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:43 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On the site url and as Martijn mentioned I also think this is a NON-issue
>
> Can't one provide the URL as a command-line parameter?
> In which case, just drop it from the POM (maybe replace with comment
> to show an example command-line)
Perhaps
On 23/09/2009, Francis De Brabandere wrote:
> I'd like to get to a formal consensus on the manifest date and this
> url. Do we really need to fix those or are they non-issues?
Issues, but non-blocking.
> On the site url and as Martijn mentioned I also think this is a NON-issue
Can't one provi
I'd like to get to a formal consensus on the manifest date and this
url. Do we really need to fix those or are they non-issues?
On the site url and as Martijn mentioned I also think this is a NON-issue
On the manifest date I agree it would be nice to have them equal but
if we have to make the rele
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> ...I don't think this should
> block a podling release, nor a TLP release
Ok, +1 to the release then, provided the issues raised in this thread
are fixed next time.
-Bertrand
---
IMO this is a non-issue. For a release, sites must be distributed to
some location on p.a.o before the site can be distributed. This
particular thing is only in:
people.apache.org.site
Empire-db Maven Site
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> Can we get another +1 or -1 vote? This release is a long time in the
> making and AIUI, only very minor issues are left...
Sebb hasn't replied to Rainer about
scp://people.apache.org/home/francisdb/public_html/empire-db/site
yet, I'd wai
Can we get another +1 or -1 vote? This release is a long time in the
making and AIUI, only very minor issues are left...
Martijn
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Rainer Döbele wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:26 PM, sebb wrote:
>> Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incuba
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:26 PM, sebb wrote:
> Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)
>
> On 22/09/2009, Rainer Döbele wrote:
> > Hi sebb,
> >
> > we have thoroughly investigated and discussed this issue and since
> everything but the timestam
As we don't use the maven generated site for now I don't see it as a
problem. I used to publish the snapshot site over there. We might set
this up correctly in the future for reports like code coverage. On
the other hand we might as well be doing this using the apache hudson
instance...
I hope thi
On 22/09/2009, Rainer Döbele wrote:
> Hi sebb,
>
> we have thoroughly investigated and discussed this issue and since
> everything but the timestamp in the manifest is equal and there is no easy
> solution for having only one Maven build, we (and our mentors) considered it
> a minor and not bl
Hi sebb,
we have thoroughly investigated and discussed this issue and since everything
but the timestamp in the manifest is equal and there is no easy solution for
having only one Maven build, we (and our mentors) considered it a minor and not
blocking issue.
We're still relying on your vote a
This is an issue with how maven builds the artifacts... The timestamps
in the MANIFEST.MF files are different, resulting in different hashes.
Martijn
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 6:10 PM, sebb wrote:
> Just noticed that the jar files in the zip/tar.gz archives are
> identical to each other, but are n
This is a known issue, but they are built from the same tag. The only
diff is the date in the manifest.
Building the dist is done at a different time of building the maven
artifacts and as the staging repo has no constant url we can not point
to it from within our release script...
I suppose this
Just noticed that the jar files in the zip/tar.gz archives are
identical to each other, but are not identical to the jar files in the
Maven repository - they have different hashes, for example:
tgz/zip: empire-db-2.0.5-incubating.jar:103bed94cfba5efe0d2c3d4e90e4c89a
Maven: empire-db-2.0.5-incubati
Hi guys,
We need one more binding vote. We already have 2 binding votes from out mentors.
Thanks,
Francis
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Thomas Fischer wrote:
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>>> [VOTE] Release A
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Thomas Fischer wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thomas
>
>> [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)
>>
>> Here we go again :-)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We just created an other release candidate for 2.0.5-incubating (rc6).
>> Our community approve
+1 (binding)
Thomas
> [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc6)
>
> Here we go again :-)
>
> Hi,
>
> We just created an other release candidate for 2.0.5-incubating (rc6).
> Our community approved the release so we now have a second binding
> voting round for IPMC Members/Mento
18 matches
Mail list logo
