sebb wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> >> It is the case that Initial Committers are eligible to serve on the PPMC,
> >> though not all choose to do so.
> >>
> >> Also, it is apparently a recommendation that invited committers be invited
> >> to the PPMC, but it doesn
gt; -Original Message-
>> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 03:52
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: incubator is a single group
>>
>> [ ... ]
>>
>> Is this an alternative?
>> Aren
ssible while keeping it simple.
-David
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 03:52
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: incubator is a single group
>
> [ ... ]
>
> Is this an alternative?
&g
ve on the PPMC.
-Original Message-
From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 03:52
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: incubator is a single group
[ ... ]
Is this an alternative?
Aren't podling committers the same as PP
On 12 November 2011 06:54, David Crossley wrote:
> William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>> >
>> >I *suggest* that incubator change the procedure such that all
>> >committers (or at least all committers within a single LDAP
>> >group) have access to all incubator areas and that new
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> >
> >I *suggest* that incubator change the procedure such that all
> >committers (or at least all committers within a single LDAP
> >group) have access to all incubator areas and that new people
> >simply be requested to only commit within areas
On 11/11/2011 1:58 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I *suggest* that incubator change the procedure such that all
committers (or at least all committers within a single LDAP
group) have access to all incubator areas and that new people
simply be requested to only commit within areas for which they
hav
same here, big +1.
Tommaso
2011/11/11 Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> Hi guys,
>
> I second Chris on that point.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 11/11/2011 04:37 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>
>> Hi Roy,
>>
>> I would be super +1 for this. I think it would really help people out, and
>> let those mentor
Hi guys,
I second Chris on that point.
Regards
JB
On 11/11/2011 04:37 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Roy,
I would be super +1 for this. I think it would really help people out, and
let those mentoring the podlings and those doing the work manage
the addition/removal of people to their
Hi Roy,
I would be super +1 for this. I think it would really help people out, and
let those mentoring the podlings and those doing the work manage
the addition/removal of people to their PPMCs. It would also hopefully
ease the burden on the PMC chairs and (hopefully) simplify infra.
Thanks fo
incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: incubator is a single group
On 11 November 2011 07:58, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> It has come to my attention that we are wasting resources and
> time trying to manage separate committer lists within infra for
> every podling. That i
On 11 November 2011 07:58, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> It has come to my attention that we are wasting resources and
> time trying to manage separate committer lists within infra for
> every podling. That is something that we can effectively manage
> once a TLP has become self-governin
Hi folks,
It has come to my attention that we are wasting resources and
time trying to manage separate committer lists within infra for
every podling. That is something that we can effectively manage
once a TLP has become self-governing and self-sufficient in its
interaction with infrastructure.
13 matches
Mail list logo
