It's also interesting to note that the current ASF license,
"Apache License 2.0" (http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0),
includes text (see paragraph 5) that basically says that any
time someone makes a contribution to Apache, they are implicitly
agreeing to license their contribution under the A
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> CLAs are not required for each bug fix. They are required for
> substantial contributors over a period of time, i.e., committers.
Many of our contributions aren't bug fixes or patches, but new rules
(some are rather large sets of rules) which could be cons
Sam Ruby wrote on Thursday, May 06, 2004 4:28 AM:
> Justin Mason wrote:
>> Hi incubator folks --
>>
>> I'm one of the PMC and devs on the SpamAssassin project.
>>
>> As we build up towards our first ASF release, we have a few
>> contributions from non-committers in our bugzilla that are ready to
Justin Mason wrote:
Hi incubator folks --
I'm one of the PMC and devs on the SpamAssassin project.
As we build up towards our first ASF release, we have a few contributions
from non-committers in our bugzilla that are ready to be applied, once we
know that the submitter's CLA status allows that. W
Hi incubator folks --
I'm one of the PMC and devs on the SpamAssassin project.
As we build up towards our first ASF release, we have a few contributions
from non-committers in our bugzilla that are ready to be applied, once we
know that the submitter's CLA status allows that. What is the correct
