On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Min Cha wrote:
> I wonder whether I am understanding a message from you.
> Do you think this project should or can be a component in Commons?
Could become...
> If so, I would like to know how to be a component in Commons.
Well, it depends. The Commons communit
(I`m sorry. I forgot general-mailing. This reply mail was sent to only
Commons. When you reply to this mail. please include
d...@commons.apache.orgto discuss together)
Hi. ted.
Thanks for your question.
In general, MQ is using to send messages among distribued servers in
enterprise environment.
I
How is this different from things like OpenMQ (from Sun) or ActiveMQ
(apache)?
These do workflow pretty well.d
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Min Cha wrote:
> Hi, Niclas.
> Thanks for your opinion.
>
> I wonder whether I am understanding a message from you.
> Do you think this project should
Hi, Niclas.
Thanks for your opinion.
I wonder whether I am understanding a message from you.
Do you think this project should or can be a component in Commons?
If so, I would like to know how to be a component in Commons.
IMHO, Robust-Task has a possibility to be a good contributor to Java and
A
I think this is a neat thing that Commons might pick up on, as I see a
problem of it to be large enough for its own community.
Cheers
Niclas
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Min Cha wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I am developing a framework called as Robust-Task.
> Robust-Task is a framework which helps
Hi, all.
I am developing a framework called as Robust-Task.
Robust-Task is a framework which helps you write READABLE code when you need
to express complex or long business flow.
(Recently, 0.1 concept version was released.)
I would like to see that the idea of Robust-Task is valuable through the
