On 4/30/06, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Craig McClanahan wrote:
> David M Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >OK, so Cliff says we need to have copyright notices on all files
> >before we can release 2.2 and that we should make the release on
> >Apache infrastructure this time
Craig McClanahan wrote:
> David M Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >OK, so Cliff says we need to have copyright notices on all files
> >before we can release 2.2 and that we should make the release on
> >Apache infrastructure this time.
> >
> >He also mentioned that somebody has a script th
On 4/28/06, David M Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, so Cliff says we need to have copyright notices on all files
before we can release 2.2 and that we should make the release on
Apache infrastructure this time.
Let me know if I can help on the copyright side.
On the release side - I do
On 4/28/06, David M Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, so Cliff says we need to have copyright notices on all files
before we can release 2.2 and that we should make the release on
Apache infrastructure this time.
He also mentioned that somebody has a script that will automatically
apply s
OK, so Cliff says we need to have copyright notices on all files
before we can release 2.2 and that we should make the release on
Apache infrastructure this time.
He also mentioned that somebody has a script that will automatically
apply said copyright notice to all source files. Anybody
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
> -1 until the following is corrected
Thanks, Cliff. I had earlier asked if you had approved their licensing
files, but as Dave indicates, they mistakenly thought that you had.
--- Noel
-
To unsub
Doh! That's what I get for hacking about late at night.
Cliff, please take a look at RC7.
http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/roller-2.2-rc
- Dave
On Apr 28, 2006, at 11:19 AM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
On 4/27/06, Dave Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Apr 27, 2006, at 6:14 PM, Cliff Sch
On Apr 28, 2006, at 9:18 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Waiting for the reroll
Sorry, I sent that impatient "drag on and on" before Cliff commented.
Not sure why it took so long to deliver. Anyhow... the Roller RC re-
roll is ready for review.
On Apr 27, 2006, at 6:14 PM, Cliff Schmidt wro
Waiting for the reroll
On Apr 27, 2006, at 10:00 AM, David M Johnson wrote:
OK guys, this is starting to drag on and on and...
Is there a third PMC member paying attention to this?
- Dave
On Apr 25, 2006, at 11:19 AM, David M Johnson wrote:
We've gone through 5 release candidates and a
OK guys, this is starting to drag on and on and...
Is there a third PMC member paying attention to this?
- Dave
On Apr 25, 2006, at 11:19 AM, David M Johnson wrote:
We've gone through 5 release candidates and are ready to release
Roller 2.2-incubating.
Votes:
+1 Matt R
+1
Cliff,
Thank you very much for talking a look. I was under the impression
that you had previously approved our wording. I'll fix LICENSE and
NOTICE files and spin a new release ASAP.
- Dave
On Apr 27, 2006, at 6:14 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
-1 until the following is corrected:
I see a
-1 until the following is corrected:
I see a couple problems with what I've just downloaded at
http://people.apache.org/~snoopdave/roller-2.2-rc/:
1. There's no NOTICE file.
2. Although there is clear mention of the LGPL components in the
README (which isn't required), I don't see anything in the
We've gone through 5 release candidates and are ready to release
Roller 2.2-incubating.
Votes:
+1 Matt R
+1 Allen G
+1 Elias T
+0 Anil G
+1 Henri Y (PMC)
Noel tells me we need two more PMC votes to release, so PMCs please
step up.
On Apr 24, 20
Dave Johnson wrote:
> We've gone through 5 release candidates and are ready to release
> Roller 2.2-incubating.
> next time [we'll] use [the] official [disclaimer] wording.
As per
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Branding, you
need to either request the PMC to approve
14 matches
Mail list logo
