Thanks.
Regarding domain names that's good advice. Should retirement happen we can
follow that course.
There seems to be fresh blood in the project. We will need to see.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 5, 2015, at 6:59 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> I don't see any project within t
I don't see any project within the Attic that came there from the
Incubator.
If one did, it should have passed its IP items already.
My opinion on domain names for a project not graduating is that we give it
back to who gave it to us, or if they don't want it back, let them decide
who we should g
If the podling *has* cleared all IP, then I could see allowing it. But we
certainly don't want improper IP residing in the Attic. These aren't Apache
projects until graduation, so don't really belong. I can see releases
strengthening the argument for archival.
Henri should be able to clarify.
Che
As this discussion is taking place someone just asked to join the project
On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 3:34 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> I recollect seeing a retiring podling with releases go to the attic. If that
> is not correct or it was an exceptional case then thanks for the correction.
>
> What
I recollect seeing a retiring podling with releases go to the attic. If that is
not correct or it was an exceptional case then thanks for the correction.
What would be done with domain names? The podling came in with the domain name
offtoolkit.org. What happens to that?
Regards,
Dave
Sent from
The Attic is for Apache projects. Podlings are simply retired/removed.
On Sep 4, 2015 9:23 AM, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Sep 3, 2015, at 5:12 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rob,
> >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 7:56 AM Rob Weir wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 3, 2015, at 5:12 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 7:56 AM Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:25 AM, John D. Ament
>> wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I'd like to bring to your attention the ODF Toolkit podling.
>>>
>>> This pod
Hi Rob,
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 7:56 AM Rob Weir wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:25 AM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I'd like to bring to your attention the ODF Toolkit podling.
> >
> > This podling has been incubating for over 4 years now. Last month they
> > filed a report without
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:25 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> I'd like to bring to your attention the ODF Toolkit podling.
>
> This podling has been incubating for over 4 years now. Last month they
> filed a report without mentor sign off, without any feedback on the mailing
> list. They have
This call for help points out that going through the incubation is more
than just adopting the Apache Way and turning out releases. Developing the
community is critical and communication is key to that.
I wonder about what has been done in that area and whether there are
lessons that can be learne
> On 02 Sep 15, at 21:51, Ian C wrote:
>
> Before moving it to the attic is there anything that can be done to
> publicise the need for people and try to attract them?
> I would love to see it continue.
The philosophical issues—differences, they’re pretty deep—as well as the
technological pref
On 03/09/15 01:51, Ian C wrote:
> I'm not sure on the numbers or the details. It would be a shame to alienate
> them.
The earliest mention of going to the attic on the ODF-Toolkit Users list
was on 21 January 2014.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-odf-users/201401.mbox/%3ccap-k
-
From: Ian C [mailto:i...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2015 18:52
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: ODF Toolkit may need help
Hi All,
I wrote the last none mentor signed off report for the ODF Toolit.
It has been, is, very quiet, but I believe there are a number of users
Hi All,
I wrote the last none mentor signed off report for the ODF Toolit.
It has been, is, very quiet, but I believe there are a number of users
out there.
I'm not sure on the numbers or the details. It would be a shame to
alienate them.
Whatever we do let's try to make sure they understand what
On 2 September 2015 at 17:11, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>
> > On 02 Sep 15, at 10:28, toki wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 02/09/15 10:25, John D. Ament wrote:
> >
> >> I'd like to bring to your attention the ODF Toolkit podling.
> >
> > This project has been torn between going to the attic, or becomi
> On 02 Sep 15, at 10:28, toki wrote:
>
>
>
> On 02/09/15 10:25, John D. Ament wrote:
>
>> I'd like to bring to your attention the ODF Toolkit podling.
>
> This project has been torn between going to the attic, or becoming a
> sub-project of another project, since at least January 2014.
>
>
On 02/09/15 10:25, John D. Ament wrote:
> I'd like to bring to your attention the ODF Toolkit podling.
This project has been torn between going to the attic, or becoming a
sub-project of another project, since at least January 2014.
IMNSHO, it should go to the attic, with Apache Corinthia pick
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 15:16 +0100, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, drew wrote:
> > Wondering if it is still appropriate, acceptable, to add myself to the
> > list of initial Committers
>
> Alas not,
Not a problem.
> now the proposal has been accepted, that initial list is final
>
> The
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, drew wrote:
Wondering if it is still appropriate, acceptable, to add myself to the
list of initial Committers
Alas not, now the proposal has been accepted, that initial list is final
The good news is that as soon as the lists are set up, the podling would
be able to vote y
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, Rob Weir wrote:
We continue to discuss moving this work to Apache. Feedback so far has
been to try for an eventual TLP. We're starting to draft the Incubation
proposal. We talked to the maintainer of the C#/AODL component and he
confirmed that it is not really active anym
We continue to discuss moving this work to Apache. Feedback so far
has been to try for an eventual TLP. We're starting to draft the
Incubation proposal. We talked to the maintainer of the C#/AODL
component and he confirmed that it is not really active anymore. He
might move it to bitbucket. So
Rob Weir wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 07:52:58 -0400:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 20:51:53 -0400:
> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> >> wrote:
> >> > Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 19:00:50 -040
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 20:51:53 -0400:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf
>> wrote:
>> > Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 19:00:50 -0400:
>> >> Hi Dennis,
>> >>
>> >> If I understand correctly, the pract
Hi Rob,
I'm a committer and PMC in the POI project and I'm interested in
integration with the ODF Toolkit.
Apache will be a good home for this codebase and many ASF projects
will benefit from it.
For POI I see the following potential benefits:
- have a common Java API to manipulate with Spreadsh
Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 20:51:53 -0400:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 19:00:50 -0400:
> >> Hi Dennis,
> >>
> >> If I understand correctly, the practice at Apache would be to remove
> >> these legacy copyright st
I'm top posting because you've answered most of the immediate issues I
had. I apologise for not having looked deeper and found the activity
you are referring to. I was clearly only looking at top level mailing
lists. Thanks for taking the time to point me in the right direction,
that kenai site is
On Jun 27, 2011, at 5:51 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf
wrote:
Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 19:00:50 -0400:
Hi Dennis,
If I understand correctly, the practice at Apache would be to remove
these legacy copyright statements and aggregate them int
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 19:00:50 -0400:
>> Hi Dennis,
>>
>> If I understand correctly, the practice at Apache would be to remove
>> these legacy copyright statements and aggregate them into a single
>> NOTICE document. This wo
Rob Weir wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 19:00:50 -0400:
> Hi Dennis,
>
> If I understand correctly, the practice at Apache would be to remove
> these legacy copyright statements and aggregate them into a single
> NOTICE document. This would be true, even if it says "DO NOT ALTER OR
> REMOVE". I i
Keep in mind this thread is in three places or two places or one place all
depending on how people have replied. It will be confusing. Please include
POI-DEV so we can discuss it here without going everywhere else as well.
On Jun 27, 2011, at 3:44 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> FYI Apache OpenOffic
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
>
> If I understand correctly, the practice at Apache would be to remove
> these legacy copyright statements and aggregate them into a single
> NOTICE document. This would be true, even if it says "DO NOT ALTER OR
> REMOVE". I imagine
Hi Rob and all,
Please help a non-English speaker, it's me :) , in the midst of
jargon; ODF, Apache, OASIS, ISO/IEC JTC1, OpenOffice, LibreOffice,
Symphony, KOffice/Calligra, Microsoft Office, Corel Wordperfect,
Google Docs, ODFDOM, DOM API, Conformance Tools, XSLTRunner, AODL,
C#/.NET, Java, PDFB
Hi Dennis,
If I understand correctly, the practice at Apache would be to remove
these legacy copyright statements and aggregate them into a single
NOTICE document. This would be true, even if it says "DO NOT ALTER OR
REMOVE". I imagine they would even tear off those tags on mattresses.
-Rob
On
FYI Apache OpenOffice.org podling has been active for two weeks. Information
is here.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenOfficeProposal
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/openofficeorg.html
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/
What do the people here on the POI project think of gettin
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Lee Fisher wrote:
>> There is activity. It just is not evenly distributed.
> [...]
>
> I presume the activity is more in the Java libraries. :-)
>
I not asking you to presume anything. I'm just following up on
interest expressed on this list a few weeks ago. I
> There is activity. It just is not evenly distributed.
[...]
I presume the activity is more in the Java libraries. :-)
As for activity in the AODL, the .NET library:
The home page's link to source is broken.
http://odftoolkit.org/projects/aodl/pages/Home
points to:
http://odftoolkit.org/sourc
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> Thanks Rob,
>
> Looking I've the Kenai site I notice that there is as good as no visible
> activity within the project. You mention that the "ODF Toolkit Union Steering
> Committee" met and approved the idea of this proposal, but this is not
I support this idea.
I think with regard to need for an SGA or not, there is the matter of the
current headings at the tops of source files. (I have no idea what is
required, I'm simply
observing what is there.)
- Dennis
"/***
Thanks Rob,
Looking I've the Kenai site I notice that there is as good as no visible
activity within the project. You mention that the "ODF Toolkit Union Steering
Committee" met and approved the idea of this proposal, but this is not visible
so we don't know what this means.
What interest is
39 matches
Mail list logo
