Re: Hama proposal, was: [VOTE] Accept Hama into the Incubator

2008-05-14 Thread Jeff Eastman
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Jeff Eastman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Niall Pemberton wrote: On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Oh, Sorry for our carelessness. We clearly overlooked the mention of the champion

Re: Hama proposal, was: [VOTE] Accept Hama into the Incubator

2008-05-14 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Jeff Eastman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Niall Pemberton wrote: > > > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Oh, Sorry for our carelessness. > > > We clearly overlooked the mention of the champion/mentor > qualif

Re: Hama proposal, was: [VOTE] Accept Hama into the Incubator

2008-05-14 Thread Jeff Eastman
Niall Pemberton wrote: On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Oh, Sorry for our carelessness. We clearly overlooked the mention of the champion/mentor qualifications. > can you elaborate on who of the initial committers are ASF > members? Maybe you me

Re: Hama proposal, was: [VOTE] Accept Hama into the Incubator

2008-05-14 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh, Sorry for our carelessness. > We clearly overlooked the mention of the champion/mentor qualifications. > > > > can you elaborate on who of the initial committers are ASF > > members? Maybe you meant committers? > >

Re: Hama proposal, was: [VOTE] Accept Hama into the Incubator

2008-05-14 Thread Edward J. Yoon
> I think you'll find it difficult to obtain 3 binding +1s until > you have enough (at least 2) Mentors. If you, Jeff and Ian > already are Apache Members this will be very easy and there's > no reason to delay the vote, IMHO. Thank you for your opinion. I would like to continue this proposal; I

Re: Hama proposal, was: [VOTE] Accept Hama into the Incubator

2008-05-14 Thread Edward J. Yoon
Oh, Sorry for our carelessness. We clearly overlooked the mention of the champion/mentor qualifications. > can you elaborate on who of the initial committers are ASF > members? Maybe you meant committers? I have amended it as follows: "initial set of Hama committers" > Also, a mentor needs t

Re: Hama proposal, was: [VOTE] Accept Hama into the Incubator

2008-05-14 Thread Thilo Goetz
Edward J. Yoon wrote: Also, a mentor needs to be an Incubator PMC member. Not sure any of your proposed mentors are. If they're Apache members, they can just ask to become IPMC members. Oh... Thank you for your advice. Then, Should we ask to become IPMC members before mentoring and delay the

Re: Hama proposal, was: [VOTE] Accept Hama into the Incubator

2008-05-14 Thread Edward J. Yoon
> Also, a mentor needs to be an Incubator PMC member. Not sure > any of your proposed mentors are. If they're Apache members, > they can just ask to become IPMC members. Oh... Thank you for your advice. Then, Should we ask to become IPMC members before mentoring and delay the vote? Edward On W