On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Janne Jalkanen wrote:
> I don't mind championing you but as mentioned by others, there will be
>> several hurdles to overcome. To change the license, you will have to get
>> an
>> agreement from everybody who ever contributed a patch to the source you
>> plan
>> to
I don't mind championing you but as mentioned by others, there will be
several hurdles to overcome. To change the license, you will have to
get an
agreement from everybody who ever contributed a patch to the source
you plan
to incubate, even for a minor bug fix. I don't know how painful that
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:05 AM, sasaboy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> don't think CLA will be the problem. Althouth a mature project, the core
> and
> all the main components of the engine are written by the core
> developers...the community mostly helped by contributing different
> implementations of some
Hi,
don't think CLA will be the problem. Althouth a mature project, the core and
all the main components of the engine are written by the core
developers...the community mostly helped by contributing different
implementations of some other components and by giving ideas for the
improvement of the
Hi Sasa,
I'm following apache.incubator not very closely but looking at
"http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#template-ip"; you need
a CLA for all contributions (and probable patches). And this seems
difficult for a mature project where many people contributed stuff under
LGPL - but a
Hi,
ObjectWeb allows Apache licensed projects but one of our reasons is also to
be recognized as Apache project, which will of course provide us with much
more visibility than beeing ObjectWeb project :-) plus to get more
developers, ideas, community, etc
I didn't provide a link for the prop
Hi Sasa,
+) sorry but I could find no link to the proposal - could you repost the
link?
+) I worked for Together Teamlösungen many moons ago so I'm aware of
Enhydra Shark (but no affiliation for the time being)
So without knowing the proposal I think it is a successful open source
project but mov
Hi,
> Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
>> ...why are moving from ObjectWeb since it is
>> well-known and respected community?...
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:56 PM, sasaboy wrote:
> ...* Resolve current potential licensing issues that are addressed in the
> Apache 2.0 license, but not in the LGPL license...
Hi,
well, we already wrote this in proposal, but here it is:
* The legal umbrella. There are no outstanding legal issues with Shark, but
the protection that Apache affords is valuable for Shark developers and
users.
* Resolve current potential licensing issues that are addressed in the
Apache 2
Hi Sasa,
the very first question is - why are moving from ObjectWeb since it is
well-known and respected community?
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
sasaboy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> some weeks ago, I've posted a question on this mailing list on how to start
> new project on Apache.
> After reading posts on ma
10 matches
Mail list logo
