Girisha Neeraje wrote:
>
> I am interested in contributing to Agila project
> (http://incubator.apache.org/projects/agila/index.html).
>
> Can you please let me know the procedure. I can take-up some tasks and work
> on them too.
Join the project mailing lists is the first step.
See http://incub
yes. I did turn on archiving, but not setup eyebrowse yet.
On Jan 14, 2005, at 2:08 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
And perhaps add an archive for the mails :)
Carsten
David Crossley wrote:
Someone should update the Agila project website :-)
It still refers people to this general@ mailing list.
http:
On Jan 13, 2005, at 9:59 PM, David Crossley wrote:
Someone should update the Agila project website :-)
It still refers people to this general@ mailing list.
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/agila/
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/agila.html
Yes, will do.
--David
Christopher Lim wrote:
Hi K
And perhaps add an archive for the mails :)
Carsten
David Crossley wrote:
Someone should update the Agila project website :-)
It still refers people to this general@ mailing list.
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/agila/
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/agila.html
--David
Christopher Lim wr
Someone should update the Agila project website :-)
It still refers people to this general@ mailing list.
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/agila/
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/agila.html
--David
Christopher Lim wrote:
> Hi Kumaran,
>
> First step is to subscribe on the following mail
Hi Kumaran,
First step is to subscribe on the following mailing lists:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We'll discuss Agila there.
Source is available at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/agila/trunk/
Cheers!
--
Chris
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:36:46 -0700, kumx thum <[EMAIL PROTECTE
OUTSTANDING !
- Original Message -
From: "Geir Magnusson Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 9:05 AM
Subject: Re: AGILA
On Dec 27, 2004, at 5:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any word on when Agila will be released ??
It's th
On Dec 27, 2004, at 5:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any word on when Agila will be released ??
It's the SVN (has been for a while), but I've been awfully tardy in
setting up lists and site and such. The issues that were interfering
are over (a product release and work-related), and I expect th
No news yet about a release, but keep posted :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any word on when Agila will be released ??
Thanks,
Rich Halsey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any word on when Agila will be released ??
Thanks,
Rich Halsey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
coming soon.
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 22:06:54 -0800 (PST), Hemali Kunjeer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> Where i can get agila documents for reference?
>
>
> -
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Meet the all-new My Yahoo! รข Try it today!
>
--
I didn't see any response to this from the Agila developers. Did
I just miss it? It seems to me that to get Agila & BPEL married
some significant work is necessary .. and obviously that's not
possible without the committment of the Agila developers!
Sanjiva.
- Original Message -
From: "M
On Nov 15, 2004, at 5:52 AM, Matthieu Riou wrote:
Hi,
I just looked into Agila in detail and thought it might be interesting
to share my remarks and questions. Of course, most of my comments are
related to BPEL compatibility, or what could be changed to ensure that
making Agila BPEL-compliant won't
On 9 Nov 2004, at 14:54, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8 Nov 2004, at 18:53, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I think we may be in violent agreement here :-)
I think we should add some type of collective entity, I just
hesitate to call it a Group as that tends to be associated with a
speci
What about ResponsibleParty?
David
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8 Nov 2004, at 18:53, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I think we may be in violent agreement here :-)
I think we should add some type of collective entity, I just hesitate
to call it a Group as that tends to be associated wit
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Boynes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 1:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Agila] assigning tasks to groups of users
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > On 8 Nov 20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8 Nov 2004, at 18:53, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I think we may be in violent agreement here :-)
I think we should add some type of collective entity, I just hesitate
to call it a Group as that tends to be associated with a specific
model ( a relatively static set of users a
Similarly, agila.engine.Instance looks close to
agila.services.InstanceInfo. Could the latter implement the former?
On 9 Nov 2004, at 11:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So far they contain most of the same information; but all their
properties are of different names (getBusinessProcessID() versus
On 8 Nov 2004, at 18:53, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I think we may be in violent agreement here :-)
I think we should add some type of collective entity, I just hesitate
to call it a Group as that tends to be associated with a specific
model ( a relatively static set of users and other groups). Call it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8 Nov 2004, at 15:58, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its very common with people workflow to assign a task to a group of
users (or a role) rather than assigning it to a specific individual
user. Then a user sees a list of all available tasks they could
On 8 Nov 2004, at 15:58, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its very common with people workflow to assign a task to a group of
users (or a role) rather than assigning it to a specific individual
user. Then a user sees a list of all available tasks they could
perform - they then grab
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its very common with people workflow to assign a task to a group of
users (or a role) rather than assigning it to a specific individual
user. Then a user sees a list of all available tasks they could perform
- they then grab one ('locking it') and then execute the task o
On Oct 7, 2004, at 10:45 AM, Robin Antony wrote:
What is the status of the Agila project? Are the requirements specs
done? Is there any initial source code available?
Is this part of any JSR implementation? Good Luck for this project!
I am currently in the process of getting some nips and tucks do
Muchos gracias
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 12:42 AM
Subject: Re: Agila - BPM
> This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> >What is BPM? You might at
What is the status of the Agila project? Are the requirements specs
done? Is there any initial source code available?
Is this part of any JSR implementation? Good Luck for this project!
Best Regards,
Robin Antony
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruce Snyder wrote:
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>What is BPM? You might at least explain the acronym on your index page!
Geir explained in previous messages that he is working on getting
the site in place.
FWIW, BPM = Business Process Management (i.e. workflow)
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpa
26 matches
Mail list logo
