Hi,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> I'll see if I can come up with a patch with edits along the lines
> described above.
See [1] for a proposed patch, and [2] for the output.
My idea is to collect the points about the rationale of the guide up
into the introduction sect
On 30 January 2012 13:01, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
>> Hey Robert,
>
> Leo :-)
>
> (Great to hear from you again)
>
>> Thanks for this; it was obviously a lot of work!
>
> A parting gift to the Incubator :-)
As a parting gift to you then..
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
> Hey Robert,
Leo :-)
(Great to hear from you again)
> Thanks for this; it was obviously a lot of work!
A parting gift to the Incubator :-)
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hey Robert,
Thanks for this; it was obviously a lot of work! I like the word
picks, flow and style of this guide a lot. There's a lot to read here
and some new stuff to learn for me -- I confess I've been ignoring as
much about trademarks as I can until a time comes up when I actually
have a need
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote on Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:31:50 +:
>> Brand would be satisfied by - say - a profession trademark search
>
> [citation needed]
I'm not will to cite out of context. Please read all the archives.
Robert
--
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote on Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:33:38 +:
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Daniel Shahaf
>> wrote:
>> > Jukka Zitting wrote on Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 23:47:38 +0100:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 1
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote on Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:33:38 +:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > Jukka Zitting wrote on Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 23:47:38 +0100:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> >> wrote:
> >> > Please note
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote on Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:31:50 +:
> Brand would be satisfied by - say - a profession trademark search
[citation needed]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For addi
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Jukka Zitting wrote on Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 23:47:38 +0100:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
>> wrote:
>> > Please note that I didn't invent this process. I would have preferred
>> > something much simpler
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>> Please note that I didn't invent this process. I would have preferred
>> something much simpler. I just documented the recommendations of the
>> brand team.
>
> Was
Jukka Zitting wrote on Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 23:47:38 +0100:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
> > Please note that I didn't invent this process. I would have preferred
> > something much simpler. I just documented the recommendations of the
> > brand team.
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> Please note that I didn't invent this process. I would have preferred
> something much simpler. I just documented the recommendations of the
> brand team.
Was this a recommendation or a requirement? I.e. are we talking about
MU
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>> The status quo is that podlings must check that their name is suitable
>> before graduation.
>
> The wording of the incubator policy on this is to "check of project
>
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> The status quo is that podlings must check that their name is suitable
> before graduation.
The wording of the incubator policy on this is to "check of project
name for trademark issues" [1], which I think is fine.
The exact wa
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>> The new documentation describing in more detail one way to check the
>> suitability of the proposed name is just about ready for public review
>
> The URL is http://
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> The new documentation describing in more detail one way to check the
> suitability of the proposed name is just about ready for public review
The URL is http://incubator.apache.org/guides/names.html
> It's fine to just dive in
16 matches
Mail list logo
