On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 23/08/2010 10:08, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>>
>> Was there a particular reason why the three podlings were selected
>> (thrift, sis, and esme).
>
> They all have Joe as a mentor and it is Joe who wants to drive this
> experiment. He feels th
On 23/08/2010 10:08, Richard Hirsch wrote:
Was there a particular reason why the three podlings were selected
(thrift, sis, and esme).
They all have Joe as a mentor and it is Joe who wants to drive this
experiment. He feels that this will benefit those particular projects.
Ross
D.
On Mo
Was there a particular reason why the three podlings were selected
(thrift, sis, and esme).
D.
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> The vote has closed and here is the tally:...
>
> I was offline and missed the
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> The vote has closed and here is the tally:...
I was offline and missed the vote but here's my late +1 for support!
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@
participated!
- Original Message
> From: Joe Schaefer
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, August 18, 2010 7:11:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] experimental delegation of new committer votes to PPMC
>
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obs
+1
--kevan
On Aug 18, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
>
> Thanks for your patience and consideration.
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Joe Schaefer
>> To
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
+1. -- justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsu
On Aug 18, 2010, at 6:11 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
>
+1
-Matt
> Thanks for your patience and consideration.
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Joe Schaefer
>>
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Specifically, for thrift, sis, and esme, I wish to
> remove the current rule that requires 3 votes from
> IPMC members to approve a vote on a new committer,
> effectively delegating the decision to the PPMC.
> Additionally the pre-ack would b
+1
Carl.
On 08/18/2010 07:31 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
+1
-- dims
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 18, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Now that the board has declared there are no legal
obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
restart the vote.
Thanks for your patience and
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
>
> Thanks for your patience and consideration.
+1
Mike
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
>
> Thanks for your patience and consideration.
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.
On 2010-08-19, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
> - Original Message
>> From: Joe Schaefer
>> Specifically, for thrift, sis, and esme, I wish to
>> remove the current rule that
Greg Stein wrote:
> The Board said that PMCs can make their own rules on how committership
> is granted. The Board has no opinion on what the Incubator wants to do
> with this topic because that choice is and has always been delegated
> to the PMC. This is a consensus opinion of the Board, as no r
+1
Dan
On Wednesday 18 August 2010 7:11:39 pm Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
>
> Thanks for your patience and consideration.
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>
> > From: Joe Sch
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Schaefer [mailto:joe_schae...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 19 August 2010 9:12 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] experimental delegation of new committer votes to
> PPMC
>
> Now that the board has dec
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
>
> Thanks for your patience and consideration.
+1, happy experimenting!
--tim
-
Hi Joe,
+1 from me. Thanks for sticking with this.
Cheers,
Chris
On 8/18/10 4:11 PM, "Joe Schaefer" wrote:
Now that the board has declared there are no legal
obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
restart the vote.
Thanks for your patience and consideration.
- Original Messag
+1
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 13:44, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> I have come to the realization that I'm not
> going to convince Noel to see things my way
> any time soon, so I'd like to now ask for a
> formal majority consensus vote on relaxed rules
> for the 3 aforementioned projects.
>
> Specifically,
To further expand on this comment:
The Board said that PMCs can make their own rules on how committership
is granted. The Board has no opinion on what the Incubator wants to do
with this topic because that choice is and has always been delegated
to the PMC. This is a consensus opinion of the Board
+1
Niall
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
>
> Thanks for your patience and consideration.
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Joe Schaefer
>> T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/18/10 23:11, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
>
> Thanks for your patience and consideration.
I know I've been quite here, but I've been
+1
-- dims
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 18, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
>
> Thanks for your patience and consideration.
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> F
Now that the board has declared there are no legal
obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
restart the vote.
Thanks for your patience and consideration.
- Original Message
> From: Joe Schaefer
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010 1:44:08 PM
> Subject:
- Original Message
> From: Noel J. Bergman
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010 2:22:02 PM
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] experimental delegation of new committer votes to PPMC
>
> Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
> > I have come to the realiza
Joe Schaefer wrote:
> I have come to the realization that I'm not going to convince Noel
> to see things my way any time soon, so I'd like to now ask for a
> formal majority consensus vote on relaxed rules for [for] thrift,
> sis, and esme, I wish to remove the current rule that requires 3
> votes
- Original Message
> From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
> To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010 1:48:38 PM
> Subject: [DISCUSS] experimental delegation of new committer votes to PPMC
> (was
>Re: [VOTE] experimental del
(starting new DISCUSS thread, to not pollute VOTE thread)
Hi Joe,
Can you do the VOTE for all Incubating projects? I'm sure mentors would put
their own projects into the mix, so rather than just a few, let's do it for all
of them.
Cheers,
Chris
On 8/16/10 10:44 AM, "Joe Schaefer" wrote:
I
28 matches
Mail list logo
