Hi All,
+1
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:24 PM, wrote:
>
> On 09/30/2013 09:27 PM, Dave wrote:
>
>> I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant
>> Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful
>> APIs, as an Apache Incubator podling.
>>
>> The original
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Dave wrote:
> Thanks for all the votes, folks! I think our 72 hour voting period is
> almost over and I'll call and end to voting later today.
Looking forward to the arrival of a promising new podling. :)
> One small note about minor changes to the proposal:
For
Thanks for all the votes, folks! I think our 72 hour voting period is
almost over and I'll call and end to voting later today.
One small note about minor changes to the proposal:
- I changed Shaozhuang Liu affiliation because he will be contributing as
an independent
- I removed the Interested Dev
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Dave wrote:
> I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant
> Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful
> APIs, as an Apache Incubator podling.
>
> The original proposal has been revised to name Dave Johnson as th
+1 (binding)
Ate
On 09/30/2013 09:27 PM, Dave wrote:
I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant
Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful
APIs, as an Apache Incubator podling.
The original proposal has been revised to name Dave Johnson as th
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Dave wrote:
> I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant
> Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful
> APIs, as an Apache Incubator podling.
>
+1 (binding)
--
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Raminder Singh wrote:
> +1 (non-binding).
>
> Thanks
> Raminder
>
> On Sep 30, 2013, at 3:27 PM, Dave wrote:
>
> > I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant
> > Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks
Raminder
On Sep 30, 2013, at 3:27 PM, Dave wrote:
> I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant
> Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful
> APIs, as an Apache Incubator podling.
>
> The original proposal has been r
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Lieven Govaerts
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Dave wrote:
> > I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant
> > Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful
> > APIs, as an Apache Incubat
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (binding)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Dave wrote:
> I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant
> Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful
> APIs, as an Apache Incubator podling.
>
+1 (non-binding)
I hope to be able to contribute to this project dur
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 03:27:24PM -0400, Dave wrote:
> I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant
> Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful
> APIs, as an Apache Incubator podling.
+1 (binding)
+1
Bertrand
+1 (binding)
Azeez
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Dave wrote:
> I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant
> Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful
> APIs, as an Apache Incubator podling.
>
> The original proposal has been revised to na
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Dave wrote:
> I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant
> Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful
> APIs, as an Apache Incubator podling.
+1 (binding)
Good luck!
Marvin Humphrey
--
+1 (binding)
Good luck guys
- Henry
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Dave wrote:
> I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant
> Backend-as-a-Service stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful
> APIs, as an Apache Incubator podling.
>
> The original proposal has b
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks
Raminder
On Sep 26, 2013, at 11:04 AM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> +1 from me (binding).
>
> G'luck!
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Jagielski
> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" ,
> "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Date: Monday
+1 from me (binding).
G'luck!
Cheers,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org" ,
"general@incubator.apache.org"
Date: Monday, September 23, 2013 5:44 AM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Subject: [VOTE] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incu
+1 (non-binding)
Lieven
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to propose
> a VOTE on accepting Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service
> stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful APIs, as an Apache
> I
+1 (non-binding)
Good luck!
I would be interested in being a committer on user-grid due to the
synergies that seem possible between Apache Knox (incubating) and user-grid.
If this is something that you would welcome then I would be happy to join
as an initial committer.
Regardless, good luck an
+1 (non binding)
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Bruno Mahé wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
>
> On 09/23/2013 05:44 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to propose
>> a VOTE on accepting Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service
>> stack for
This VOTE is CANCELLED.
There were some modifications to the mentor and committer
list post-VOTE and to avoid ANY concerns and/or confusion,
I have decided to stop this vote.
On Sep 23, 2013, at 8:44 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to propos
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Senaka.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> +1
>
> On 23 September 2013 22:44, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to propose
> > a VOTE on accepting Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service
> > stack
All done. Thx!
On Sep 24, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> Yes I was volunteering to mentor .. please add me.
>
> Sanjiva.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Sanjiva has expressed interest in helping out as a mentor,
>> but I'm not sure if he's off
Yes I was volunteering to mentor .. please add me.
Sanjiva.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Sanjiva has expressed interest in helping out as a mentor,
> but I'm not sure if he's officially asking. If he does, I'm a
> big +1 on adding him. If you are also interested, tha
+1. I'll add you to the proposal
On Sep 24, 2013, at 8:54 AM, Jake Farrell wrote:
> I would be interested in helping as a mentor for Usergrid if slots are
> available
>
> -Jake
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Sanjiva has expressed interest in helping out as a m
+1
On 23 September 2013 22:44, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to propose
> a VOTE on accepting Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service
> stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful APIs, as an Apache
> Incubator podling.
>
> Voting
I would be interested in helping as a mentor for Usergrid if slots are
available
-Jake
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Sanjiva has expressed interest in helping out as a mentor,
> but I'm not sure if he's officially asking. If he does, I'm a
> big +1 on adding him. If y
Sanjiva has expressed interest in helping out as a mentor,
but I'm not sure if he's officially asking. If he does, I'm a
big +1 on adding him. If you are also interested, that would
give Usergrid a nice solid 4 mentors, which I think is pretty
much on the mark.
On Sep 23, 2013, at 9:49 PM, Jake Fa
+ 1 (binding).
Good project and I will vote nevertheless, but given there is interest, why not
have a 3rd Mentor on board? This is not essential but as discussed at various
times, makes release and other IPMC binding decisions easy.
I do not want to trigger a discussion on, if we want to chang
+1 (non binding)
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Imesh Gunaratne
wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Bruno Mahé wrote:
>
>> +1 (non binding)
>>
>>
>> On 09/23/2013 05:44 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>> After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to
+1 (non binding)
On 09/23/2013 05:44 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to propose
a VOTE on accepting Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service
stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful APIs, as an Apache
Incubator podling.
Voting
+1
-Jake
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to propose
> a VOTE on accepting Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service
> stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful APIs, as an Apache
> Incubator podli
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:44 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to propose
> a VOTE on accepting Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service
> stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful APIs, as an Apache
> Incubator p
+1
Dan
On Sep 23, 2013, at 8:44 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to propose
> a VOTE on accepting Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service
> stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful APIs, as an Apache
> Incubator podling.
>
+1 (binding)
good luck guys!
- Henry
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to propose
> a VOTE on accepting Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service
> stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful APIs, as
Did you see what you replied too?? "propose a vote" and
the subject sez [VOTE]. :)
On Sep 23, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> Are you going to start a VOTE thread?
>
> +1 in any case :-).
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> After a useful and suc
Are you going to start a VOTE thread?
+1 in any case :-).
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to propose
> a VOTE on accepting Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service
> stack for web & mobile applications base
+1
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to propose
> a VOTE on accepting Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service
> stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful APIs, as an Apache
> Incubator podling.
>
>
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> Sent from my iPhone 5
>
>> On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:44 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to propose
>> a VOTE on accepting Usergrid, a mu
+1 from me.
Thanks,
Raymond
Sent from my iPhone 5
> On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:44 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to propose
> a VOTE on accepting Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service
> stack for web & mobile applications based on RES
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> After a useful and successful proposal cycle, I would like to propose
> a VOTE on accepting Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service
> stack for web & mobile applications based on RESTful APIs, as an Apache
> Incubato
43 matches
Mail list logo
