Re: [VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

2017-03-15 Thread Craig Russell
+1 looks like a good solution to a sticky problem. Craig > On Mar 11, 2017, at 9:31 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > Log4cxx was originally a sub-project of the Logging Services. In 2013 several > users became frustrated that they were submitting patches but there were no > committers who could a

Re: [VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

2017-03-13 Thread John D. Ament
Since Thorsten confirmed, please feel free to consider my vote a +1. On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 2:57 PM Ralph Goers wrote: > There was a discussion on the log4cxx list on March 1st and 2nd so > Thorsten is aware. He also accepted the invite to be a Logging Services > committer. > > Yes, the vote ha

Re: [VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

2017-03-13 Thread Felix Meschberger
+1 Regards Felix > Am 11.03.2017 um 09:31 schrieb Ralph Goers : > > Log4cxx was originally a sub-project of the Logging Services. In 2013 several > users became frustrated that they were submitting patches but there were no > committers who could apply them. The Logging Services PMC was not co

Re: [VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

2017-03-12 Thread Pierre Smits
+1 Best regards, Pierre Smits ORRTIZ.COM OFBiz based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 8:57 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > There was a discussion on the log4cxx list on March 1st and 2nd so > Thorsten is

Re: [VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

2017-03-11 Thread Ralph Goers
There was a discussion on the log4cxx list on March 1st and 2nd so Thorsten is aware. He also accepted the invite to be a Logging Services committer. Yes, the vote had to happen on the private list. The Logging PMC is looking at ways to correct that. Here is my +1 Ralph > On Mar 11, 2017, at

Re: [VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

2017-03-11 Thread John D. Ament
That link doesn't work for me (its a logging PMC only link). I'm worried about the vote happening in private but think I understand why. Here's a valid link to the vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f1bed2e2964fc8de4004aeff2b14f8f99931db2c5d574704b17e16c9@%3Cprivate.logging.apache.