> The work you did to research and verify this, is the "grease" I was talking
> about.
>>
>> Therefore I consider this code is fine to stay in SVN.
>>
>> I really don't know what other kinds of elbow grease I can apply
>
> That's it for me. I have no problems with this code staying around in case
>
Hi Christian,
On Jul 6, 2011, at 5:48 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
After the initial import only a few commits happened. All changes are
from the initial committers with CLA on file (no external
contributors).
The work you did to research and verify this, is the "grease" I was
talking abo
OK, finally I understood.
I will sign it off then.
Thanks for your patience and your explains
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> We're interested in the history of the initial revision in svn;
> subsequent commits will be covered by CLAs etc per our usual process.
>
> In thi
We're interested in the history of the initial revision in svn;
subsequent commits will be covered by CLAs etc per our usual process.
In this case it sounds good. If this was a commercial entity
contributing, and they signed a software grant then we'd be covered.
Update the Incubator website to in
After the initial import only a few commits happened. All changes are
from the initial committers with CLA on file (no external
contributors).
Therefore I consider this code is fine to stay in SVN.
I really don't know what other kinds of elbow grease I can apply
Cheers
Christian
On Tue, Jul 5,
Seems good.
Once said grease is applied, we should update the website to sign off
on copyright; then close down the podling.
Hen
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Craig L Russell
wrote:
> There is a grant on file (documents/grants/imsec-alois.pdf) from IMSEC GmbH
> for "ALOIS (code and all docume
There is a grant on file (documents/grants/imsec-alois.pdf) from IMSEC
GmbH for "ALOIS (code and all documentation)" dated 4-Oct-2010.
This plus some elbow grease should allow a mentor to definitively
establish provenance of the code...
Craig
On Jul 5, 2011, at 9:13 AM, Christian Grobmeier
>> Do you have any tipps how I can make sure the source is covered by the
>> CLAs? As I understood we just have the initial import in SVN. All
>> committers have CLAs on file. Is that enough?
>
> It depends on who the copyright owners/licensees of the original
> import were. Identify that set, then
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi Hen,
>
>> To confirm, will you be doing the following steps:
>>
>> * Investigate whether the source was covered by CLAs.
>> * If so then update the web page before moving to retired.
>> * Otherwise delete the source from svn.
>
> Yes,
Hi Hen,
> To confirm, will you be doing the following steps:
>
> * Investigate whether the source was covered by CLAs.
> * If so then update the web page before moving to retired.
> * Otherwise delete the source from svn.
Yes, i noted that and will care on it.
Do you have any tipps how I can mak
Hi Christan,
To confirm, will you be doing the following steps:
* Investigate whether the source was covered by CLAs.
* If so then update the web page before moving to retired.
* Otherwise delete the source from svn.
?
Hen
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> I would
I would like to close this vote with +1 from:
Betrand Delacretaz
Alan Cabrera
Henri Yandell
Mohamma Nour El-Din
Noel Bergman
Christian Grobmeier
I will try to do the necessary retirement steps as soon as I can.
Thanks for your time!
Christian
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Christian Grobmeier
+1
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> +1.
>
> Source code should be removed from SVN as the podling has not signed
> off on its copyright items.
>
> Hen
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> as already mentioned last week, the ALOI
+1.
Source code should be removed from SVN as the podling has not signed
off on its copyright items.
Hen
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as already mentioned last week, the ALOIS project is dead and it seems
> there is no way to recover in near future (o
+1
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 21, 2011, at 8:52 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as already mentioned last week, the ALOIS project is dead and it seems
> there is no way to recover in near future (or even later). The
> developers told me in a private message in March that they cannot
> co
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> ...Please vote for retirement of the alois podling. If this vote passes,
> I will step to the discussions on retirement and finally retire it...
+1
-Bertrand
-
To un
17 matches
Mail list logo
