On 7 April 2011 13:49, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> Please review this again if you have time -
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/branches/0.2/
>
> - added "DISCLAIMER.txt" file
+1
The Hama website also needs to include the disclaimer (and apache
should be spelt Apache), and should in
Please review this again if you have time -
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/branches/0.2/
- added "DISCLAIMER.txt" file
- added license header to "conf/log4j.properties".
("src/test/log4j.properties" is deleted.)
- updated "NOTICE" and "LICENSE" files.
- deleted unused dependenc
Thank you all, I'm going to fix these things.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Apr 6, 2011, at 7:52 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
>
>> 72 hours has passed.
>>
>> Should I re-open vote?
>
> Hi Edward,
> 72 hours is the normal waiting time for a vote. Many votes run for a lon
On Apr 6, 2011, at 7:52 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> 72 hours has passed.
>
> Should I re-open vote?
Hi Edward,
72 hours is the normal waiting time for a vote. Many votes run for a longer
period of time. There's no need to re-open a vote.
FYI, I never received your original vote email. Not su
On 3 April 2011 23:40, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> Subversion tag for release:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.2-RC2/
NOTICE.txt is non-standard; see
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vcl/tags/release-2.2.1-RC2/NOTICE
for a conforming example.
There's no Incubation
72 hours has passed.
Should I re-open vote?
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> Hi Incubator IPMC,
>
> The Apache Hama community voted on and approved a proposal to release
> Apache Hama 0.2-RC2.
>
> Thread about vote:
> http://s.apache.org/9pF
>
> Vote result:
> http://s.apa
