Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

2016-02-08 Thread Dan Smith
Yup, that IP brings up a Verizon search page. It looks like they are providing you this DNS hijacking "service." I filed GEODE-944 for this, we can discuss on that issue whether we want to do anything to fix these tests in environments like yours. You could also use a different DNS server or see i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

2016-02-06 Thread John D. Ament
Non-authoritative answer: Name: badHostName.badCompany.com Address: 92.242.140.21 On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:34 AM Dan Smith wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: > > > Hi John, > > > > Thanks for testing it out and reporting the test failure. The error is > > not ex

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

2016-02-04 Thread Dan Smith
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: > Hi John, > > Thanks for testing it out and reporting the test failure. The error is > not expected based on previous testing but it’s great to get results from > different environments. You don’t happen to have an entry for > ‘badhostname.b

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

2016-02-04 Thread Anthony Baker
Thanks for clarifying this Justin. Filed GEODE-914 to clean this up. Anthony > On Feb 3, 2016, at 2:04 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> NOTICE contains copyright, commons-io [2] > > It’s my understanding that for an ASF produced product with the name, > copyright and “this software pr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

2016-02-03 Thread Anthony Baker
Hi John, Thanks for testing it out and reporting the test failure. The error is not expected based on previous testing but it’s great to get results from different environments. You don’t happen to have an entry for ‘badhostname.badcompany.bad’ in /etc/hosts by chance? The test is expecting

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

2016-02-03 Thread John D. Ament
+0 for now but if someone wants to give some tips I'd be happy to change to a +1 Everything checks out, but when building the source package, it fails here :gemfire-core:test com.gemstone.gemfire.distributed.LocatorLauncherJUnitTest > testSetBindAddressToUnknownHost FAILED java.lang.Assert

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

2016-02-03 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: > Hello, > > This is a call for a vote on the Apache Geode (incubating) release > 1.0.0-incubating.M1. > > This release candidate, 1.0.0-incubating.M1.RC2, has successfully passed a > vote for a release on the geode developer mailing list. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

2016-02-03 Thread Niall Pemberton
I already reviewed the release and voted +1 on dev@geode, but just wanted to ensure that my vote was also counted here. +1 (binding) Niall On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > Hello, > > This is a call for a vote on the Apache Geode (incubating) release > 1.0.0-incubating.M1.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

2016-02-03 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Changing my vote to +1 binding. > As I mentioned in my other response, thanks for the great feedback and quick > turnaround! I filed JIRA’s based on the issues you noted below. No problem, thanks for raising the JIRA’s quickly. >> This file [12] incorrectly has an Apache header and is lic

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

2016-02-03 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > NOTICE contains copyright, commons-io [2] It’s my understanding that for an ASF produced product with the name, copyright and “this software produced at the ASF” that nothing needs to be added to notice. > NOTICE contains copyright and a few other declarations, log4j2 [3] Drop the Apach

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

2016-02-03 Thread Anthony Baker
Hi Justin, As I mentioned in my other response, thanks for the great feedback and quick turnaround! I filed JIRA’s based on the issues you noted below. Anthony > On Feb 2, 2016, at 10:06 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > +0.5 for the license issues and unable to compile. Willing to chang

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

2016-02-03 Thread Anthony Baker
Justin, Thanks for the great feedback! Regarding the NOTICE in the binary distribution: the contents came directly from NOTICE files contained in bundled dependencies included in the distribution. I’m sure I don’t completely understand the requirements yet [1] so thanks for any clarification

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

2016-02-02 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, From a very quick look at the binary release the LICENSE / NOTICE needs some work. The NOTICE contains a lot of what should go in LICENSE. Normally there is no need to list MIT, BSD [1] or Apache [2] license software in NOTICE. Thanks, Justin 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

2016-02-02 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +0.5 for the license issues and unable to compile. Willing to change to +1 if these are sorted in the next release/explained. I checked: - file name contain incubating - signatures and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - NOTICE looks OK - LICENSE is missing a few items (see below). Everything