On May 1, 2013, at 10:41 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> You may want to solicit feedback still via this thread. At least
> there's the question of the CHANGES file that was raised. Not sure it's
> a blocker for release, but it's a question that was raised.
I think it's better if people vote -1 du
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 10:34:42AM -0700, Jordan Zimmerman wrote:
> > This message isn't clear... Did Curator hold a vote internally yet?
> > If so, it's usually good to include a reference to that VOTE RESULT
> > thread when sharing with general@i.a.o. It's also useful to reference
> > any IPMC
> This message isn't clear... Did Curator hold a vote internally yet?
> If so, it's usually good to include a reference to that VOTE RESULT
> thread when sharing with general@i.a.o. It's also useful to reference
> any IPMC votes that you may have gotten during that initial vote for
> reference.
>
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 10:03:05PM -0700, Jordan Zimmerman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a vote to release Apache Curator 2.0.0-incubating
>
> Link to release notes:
> * no release notes as this is the initial release *
>
> Staging repo:
> http://people.apache.org/~randgalt/staging/
>
> Binary ar
Oops - that's a vestige from the Netflix source. I should remove it.
-JZ
> However, there is a CHANGES file which details lots of previous releases -
> what's that about?
> Should be explained in the release notes - which can accompany any release,
> even the first.
On 1 May 2013 06:03, Jordan Zimmerman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a vote to release Apache Curator 2.0.0-incubating
>
> Link to release notes:
> * no release notes as this is the initial release *
>
>
However, there is a CHANGES file which details lots of previous releases -
what's that about?
Sh
