People act when they have a personal motivation to do so. There's no
boss telling people to do things around here.
Therefore, there's no sense in which we have two few people, we just
have too few people interested in engaging with specific projects.
Interest can be both practical (the project is
On 24 January 2013 18:52, Benson Margulies wrote:
> If you model the IPMC as a group of volunteers who have collectively
> volunteered to mentor and supervise new projects, then the current
> situation strongly suggests that we have either too many projects or
> not enough volunteers. Calling peo
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> +1 (IPMC)
>
> I checked md5/sig, looked for headers and such in the source code. All
> looks good to me.
> I saw Bloodhound uses RAT. I found it very helpful when a RAT report
> is provided together with the vote. Its optional, but very
Hi !
On 1/24/13, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
[...]
>
> So, in my entirely personal opinion, this leaves two directions: more
> volunteers or less projects. In the extreme, some would read this as a
> reason to close the gates to new projects until we have proven
> capacity.
>
Is there any chance t
If you model the IPMC as a group of volunteers who have collectively
volunteered to mentor and supervise new projects, then the current
situation strongly suggests that we have either too many projects or
not enough volunteers. Calling people 'lazy' has rarely been observed
to get them to do more w
+1 (IPMC)
I checked md5/sig, looked for headers and such in the source code. All
looks good to me.
I saw Bloodhound uses RAT. I found it very helpful when a RAT report
is provided together with the vote. Its optional, but very nice imho.
Also I think the capitalization of jQuery in the NOTICE fil
For argument's sake, let's say "two". That is the specified/recommended
minimum. Thus, the IPMC must contribute an additional +1. Thus, it can
totally block podling releases thru its laziness and inactivity.
Sounds broken.
-g
On Jan 23, 2013 5:22 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
> How many active mento
Hi,
It seems that we need just one more IPMC vote in order to release Apache
Bloodhound 0.4 (incubating). Sebb has not yet indicated whether he is
happy with Brane's response but would anyone else like to look and
perhaps give us a final vote?
Cheers,
Gary
On 18/01/13 11:03, Branko Čibe
On 18.01.2013 11:39, sebb wrote:
> On 17 January 2013 22:47, Ryan Ollos wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I would like to initiate the vote for releasing Apache Bloodhound 0.4
>> (incubating)
>> in the incubator following the successful vote of the Bloodhound PPMC.
>>
>> The vote PPMC vote thread:
>>
On 17 January 2013 22:47, Ryan Ollos wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to initiate the vote for releasing Apache Bloodhound 0.4
> (incubating)
> in the incubator following the successful vote of the Bloodhound PPMC.
>
> The vote PPMC vote thread:
> http://markmail.org/message/d2yvz2tx5pj5
On 17.01.2013 23:47, Ryan Ollos wrote:
> ...
> Please vote:
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.4
> [ ] +0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain)
+1 (binding)
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
--
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Ryan Ollos wrote:
>...
> Please vote:
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.4
> [ ] +0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain)
+1 (binding; Mentor)
-
To un
12 matches
Mail list logo
