On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>> It seems that nobody has objections on this one.
>> Thanks Ralph and Marvin for responding.
>
> Also I and Mark Struberg cast +1 votes, but it looks like those went
>
Hi,
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> It seems that nobody has objections on this one.
> Thanks Ralph and Marvin for responding.
Also I and Mark Struberg cast +1 votes, but it looks like those went
only to trademarks@.
Here's a copy also for general@ of the rational
It seems that nobody has objections on this one.
Thanks Ralph and Marvin for responding.
I will follow up on trademarks.
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Zeta Components has been retired and the committers want to go to
> github with the project. They have
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> [] +1, allow them to use Zeta Components as name
> [] -1, don't, because
+1
Good luck in your new home, Zeta Components!
Although your project is migrating elsewhere, I hope that incubation
has been a net positive for you, and that
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Why does the IPMC need to vote on this? I don't see it as part of the list
> below of things the trademarks committee requires.
I understood Shane that the IPMC needs to agree on that aswell.
>
> Ralph
>
> On May 14, 2012, at 5:30 AM, Christ
Why does the IPMC need to vote on this? I don't see it as part of the list
below of things the trademarks committee requires.
Ralph
On May 14, 2012, at 5:30 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Zeta Components has been retired and the committers want to go to
> github with the project.