Ok, thanks for the insight, Justin!
I'll open up an issue to fix these in the next release.
Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
Is this something we can fix on the next release, or do we need to tank this
RC? I'm not sure how critically to apply the policy since these are generated
code.
I saw these
Hi,
> Is this something we can fix on the next release, or do we need to tank this
> RC? I'm not sure how critically to apply the policy since these are generated
> code.
I saw these in my reviews but thought them ok. My understanding was because
they are generated files they don’t need header
> On Jan 6, 2016, at 7:16 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
>
>> On 5 Jan 2016, at 11:55, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>
>> See http://compliance.rocks/result.html?1152a2a9 for a list of minor
>> nits (missing some license headers in a bunch of python scripts).
>>
> nice script
+1
> I think some other proj
> On 5 Jan 2016, at 11:55, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
> Tentative +0.5
>
> License and Notice there, no binaries in src archive, digests match
>
> License count as follows:
> Apache License/2.0: 1196
> BSD 3-Clause License: 2
> License missing: 101 (see below)
> Python License/2.0: 2
>
> See http:
Justin Mclean wrote:
Year is incorrect in the NOTICE file so you might want to fix that for the next
release.
I also noticed that some of the bundled (Apache licensed) kazoo files don’t
have correct license headers. Perhaps you could fix that upstream? You could
get them to add a NOTICE fil
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- signature and hashes good
- incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- No unexpended binary files (false positive on one fake tar file)
- All ASF source files have Apache header
- Can compile from source
Year is incorrect in the NOTICE file so
Forwarding my +1 vote from dev@slider
> On Jan 4, 2016, at 2:34 PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> This is a call for a vote on the Apache Slider (incubating) release
> 0.90.2-incubating.
>
> This release candidate, 0.90.2-incubating-RC1 has successfully passed a vote
> for a release
Daniel Gruno wrote:
License count as follows:
Apache License/2.0: 1196
BSD 3-Clause License: 2
License missing: 101 (see below)
Python License/2.0: 2
Seehttp://compliance.rocks/result.html?1152a2a9 for a list of minor
nits (missing some license headers in a bunch of python scripts).
Thanks fo
Forwarding my +1 (binding) from the dev@slider vote.
Steve Loughran wrote:
Hello,
This is a call for a vote on the Apache Slider (incubating) release
0.90.2-incubating.
This release candidate, 0.90.2-incubating-RC1 has successfully passed a vote
for a release
on the slider developer mailing l
Tentative +0.5
License and Notice there, no binaries in src archive, digests match
License count as follows:
Apache License/2.0: 1196
BSD 3-Clause License: 2
License missing: 101 (see below)
Python License/2.0: 2
See http://compliance.rocks/result.html?1152a2a9 for a list of minor
nits (missing
My own vote, of course:
+1 (binding)
> On 4 Jan 2016, at 19:34, Steve Loughran wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> This is a call for a vote on the Apache Slider (incubating) release
> 0.90.2-incubating.
>
> This release candidate, 0.90.2-incubating-RC1 has successfully passed a vote
> for a release
>
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 01/04/2016 08:34 PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
Hello,
This is a call for a vote on the Apache Slider (incubating) release
0.90.2-incubating.
This release candidate, 0.90.2-incubating-RC1 has successfully passed a vote
for a release
on the slider developer mailing list
12 matches
Mail list logo