On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> It's been a week since the Accumulo proposal was submitted for
> discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified
> in response. Sufficient mentors have volunteered. I thus feel we are
> now ready for a vote.
>
> The la
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 18:22, Doug Cutting wrote:
> It's been a week since the Accumulo proposal was submitted for
> discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified
> in response. Sufficient mentors have volunteered. I thus feel we are
> now ready for a vote.
[X] +1 Acce
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> It's been a week since the Accumulo proposal was submitted for
> discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified
> in response. Sufficient mentors have volunteered. I thus feel we are
> now ready for a vote.
>
> The la
+1 (binding)
Tommaso
2011/9/9 Doug Cutting
> It's been a week since the Accumulo proposal was submitted for
> discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified
> in response. Sufficient mentors have volunteered. I thus feel we are
> now ready for a vote.
>
> The latest pr
+1 non-binding.
Sent from my iPad
On Sep 11, 2011, at 4:23 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
>> [ X ] +1 Accept Accumulo for incubation
>
> Binding.
>
> --Alex
>
> -
> To unsubsc
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> [ X ] +1 Accept Accumulo for incubation
Binding.
--Alex
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incu
+1 binding
Regards,
Alan
On Sep 9, 2011, at 9:22 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> It's been a week since the Accumulo proposal was submitted for
> discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified
> in response. Sufficient mentors have volunteered. I thus feel we are
> now read
Qualifying: +1 (non-binding).
I would also like to repeat what Marvin Humphrey said:
"I've been impressed by how the Accumulo representatives have conducted
themselves during this week of discussion, and I believe that they will
become
valuable and productive participants within Apache."
- milin
(binding) +1
2011/9/9 Doug Cutting :
> It's been a week since the Accumulo proposal was submitted for
> discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified
> in response. Sufficient mentors have volunteered. I thus feel we are
> now ready for a vote.
>
> The latest proposal c
+1 (binding) -C
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> It's been a week since the Accumulo proposal was submitted for
> discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified
> in response. Sufficient mentors have volunteered. I thus feel we are
> now ready for a
+1 (non-binding)
St.Ack
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> It's been a week since the Accumulo proposal was submitted for
> discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified
> in response. Sufficient mentors have volunteered. I thus feel we are
> now rea
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
>
> Please cast your votes:
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Accumulo for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to Accumulo incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject Accumulo for incubation
>
> This vote will close 72 hours from now.
+1
---
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> It's been a week since the Accumulo proposal was submitted for
> discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified
> in response. Sufficient mentors have volunteered. I thus feel we are
> now ready for a vo
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 09:22:51AM -0700, Doug Cutting wrote:
> [ ] +1 Accept Accumulo for incubation
> [ ] +0 Indifferent to Accumulo incubation
> [ ] -1 Reject Accumulo for incubation
+1 (binding)
I've been impressed by how the Accumulo representatives have conducted
themselves during this w
+1 binding
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Tim Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
>> It's been a week since the Accumulo proposal was submitted for
>> discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified
>> in response. Sufficient mentors
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> It's been a week since the Accumulo proposal was submitted for
> discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified
> in response. Sufficient mentors have volunteered. I thus feel we are
> now ready for a vote.
>
> The l
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> It's been a week since the Accumulo proposal was submitted for
> discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified
> in response. Sufficient mentors have volunteered. I thus feel we are
> now ready for
+1 (binding). Welcome to Apache, fellow government employees! :-)
Cheers,
Chris
On Sep 9, 2011, at 10:22 AM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> It's been a week since the Accumulo proposal was submitted for
> discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified
> in response. Sufficient m
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 5:33 PM, wrote:
> +1 !
>
> - milind
>
> On 9/9/11 9:22 AM, "Doug Cutting" wrote:
>
>>It's been a week since the Accumulo proposal was submitted for
>>discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified
>>in response. Sufficient mentors ha
+1 !
- milind
On 9/9/11 9:22 AM, "Doug Cutting" wrote:
>It's been a week since the Accumulo proposal was submitted for
>discussion. A few questions were asked, and the proposal was clarified
>in response. Sufficient mentors have volunteered. I thus feel we are
>now ready for a vote.
>
>The l
20 matches
Mail list logo
