On Mon, Apr 28, 2014, at 08:49 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
> Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
>
[X] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator (binding)
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twi
+1 (binding)
On Apr 29, 2014, at 7:54 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 04/28/2014 03:49 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>> Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
>> Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
>>
>> [ ] +1 A
+1 (non-binding) and thanks everyone for the support so far!
Best
Alex
On 28/04/2014 14:49, Chip Childers wrote:
Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
[ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
[ ]
+1 binding
Good luck guys.
Cheers
John Chambers
On 29 April 2014 15:51, Imesh Gunaratne wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Lakmal Warusawithana >wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Chip Childers > >wrote:
> >
> > > Based on the previous discussion of
+1
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Lakmal Warusawithana wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Chip Childers >wrote:
>
> > Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
> > Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept
+1
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
> Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
> [ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Brooklyn
> [
+1
Regards
JB
On 04/28/2014 03:49 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
[ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
[ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Brooklyn
[ ] -1 Do
+1 (non-binding)
-sebastien
On Apr 29, 2014, at 12:14 PM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
> +1
>
> Paul
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Sergio Fernández <
> sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> On 28/04/14 15:49, Chip Childers wrote:
>>
>>> Based on the previous dis
+1
Paul
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Sergio Fernández <
sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at> wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On 28/04/14 15:49, Chip Childers wrote:
>
>> Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
>> Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now
+1
On 28/04/14 15:49, Chip Childers wrote:
Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
[ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
[ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Brooklyn
[ ] -1 Do not accept Brook
+1
On Apr 29, 2014 3:43 AM, "Olivier Lamy" wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On 28 April 2014 23:49, Chip Childers wrote:
> > Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
> > Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubato
+1
On 28 April 2014 23:49, Chip Childers wrote:
> Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
> Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
> [ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Brooklyn
> [ ] -1 Do
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 28, 2014, at 6:49 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
> Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
> [ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the acc
+1
+Vote of thanks to everyone who volunteered to become one of our mentors
Best
Duncan
On 28 April 2014 14:49, Chip Childers wrote:
> Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
> Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Broo
+1
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Andrei Savu wrote:
> +1
>
> -- Andrei Savu
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Chip Childers >wrote:
>
> > Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
> > Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
> >
> > [ ]
+1
-- Andrei Savu
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
> Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
> [ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the acceptance
+1
-Jake
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
> Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
> [ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Brook
+1 (binding)
Good luck guys
On Monday, April 28, 2014, Chip Childers wrote:
> Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
> Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
> [ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the accept
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Based on the previous discussion of accepting Brooklyn into the Apache
> Incubator as a podling, I'd like to call a vote for this now.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
> [ ] +/-0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Brooklyn
> [ ] -1
+1
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 Accept Brooklyn into the Incubator
21 matches
Mail list logo
