Leo Simons wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
What do you think?
+1 to redundancy. -0 on making it an 'absolute' requirement.
Of course.
1 Mentor is a requirement.
>1 Mentor is a *strong* suggestion.
We need to make sure we ourselves don't get so completely
lost in figuring out the right process t
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
What do you think?
+1 to redundancy. -0 on making it an 'absolute' requirement.
We need to make sure we ourselves don't get so completely
lost in figuring out the right process that there is no energy
left to apply it.
cheers!
- Leo
-
Stephen McConnell wrote:
...
Keep in mind that I can see the use of JIRA for an incubation iniative
as something seperate for a projects own use of JIRA for bug tracking.
Same here. Projects can use Jira to track their Incubation status and
issues.
...
Ask the following question:
* what are t
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Stephen McConnell wrote:
...
> An important
aspect here is visibility of status and pending actions. This takes
me back to the discussion about using JIRA - that's the sort of
example where I could checkout open-actions on any incubator project
- and based on that
Stephen McConnell wrote:
...
> An important
aspect here is visibility of status and pending actions. This takes me
back to the discussion about using JIRA - that's the sort of example
where I could checkout open-actions on any incubator project - and based
on that information I could jump in a
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Nicola,
I suppose the only slight reservation would be who is accountable?
The old "Fred Bloggs is looking after that" can kick in. I think
the Incubator PMC also wants to be able to hold
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Nicola,
I suppose the only slight reservation would be who is accountable?
The old "Fred Bloggs is looking after that" can kick in. I think the
Incubator PMC also wants to be able to hold people accountable for
inubat
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Nicola,
I suppose the only slight reservation would be who is accountable?
The old "Fred Bloggs is looking after that" can kick in. I think the
Incubator PMC also wants to be able to hold people accountable for
inubation activities. Gets har
> > I think the accountable individual is an important criteria!
> > If the accountable person fails
No. We are a Community. We do not ALLOW an "accountable person" to fail.
We are supposed to be here on behalf of the ASF and on behalf of the
podling. It isn't a matter of an accountable person
> who is accountable?
The PMC is accountable. There has been much expecting someone else to take
care of things, and too little of making sure that things get done.
Everyone who has seen something that needs to be done, and hasn't at least
made sure that it did, gets to share the problem. And ev
Stephen McConnell wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
...
If the accountable person fails, what can we do? Nothing.
>
I think the accountable individual is an important criteria!
If the accountable person fails
We have to make it so that he does not fail. This proposal is based on
the fact that i
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Nicola,
I suppose the only slight reservation would be who is accountable?
The old "Fred Bloggs is looking after that" can kick in. I think the
Incubator PMC also wants to be able to hold people accountable for
inubation activities. Gets
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Nicola,
I suppose the only slight reservation would be who is accountable? The
old "Fred Bloggs is looking after that" can kick in. I think the
Incubator PMC also wants to be able to hold people accountable for
inubation activities. Gets harder with multiple people.
I
Nicola,
I suppose the only slight reservation would be who is accountable? The
old "Fred Bloggs is looking after that" can kick in. I think the
Incubator PMC also wants to be able to hold people accountable for
inubation activities. Gets harder with multiple people.
Does it have to be forma
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Wednesday, November 12, 2003, at 05:46 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
...
In any case, the Mentors are on the PMC, so the PMC responsiveness
would increase with more Mentors that are active on the projects being
there.
Am I on the incubator PMC? I'm now assisting J
On Wednesday, November 12, 2003, at 05:46 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
From the current incubations, it's becoming quite clear IMO that a
single Mentor is not enough for most, if not all, incubated >>> projects.
As far as JaxMe is concerned, we
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
From the current incubations, it's becoming quite clear IMO that a
single Mentor is not enough for most, if not all, incubated projects.
As far as JaxMe is concerned, we had so far more problems with missing
replies on [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAI
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
From the current incubations, it's becoming quite clear IMO that a
single Mentor is not enough for most, if not all, incubated projects.
As far as JaxMe is concerned, we had so far more problems with missing
replies on [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dims, our m
18 matches
Mail list logo
