Re: [POLICY][DOC] IP clearance process refinements

2006-03-20 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 3/19/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/19/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > sorry for the confusion: this is about the actual process of preparing > > the paperwork required by the incubator not the receipt of the > > software grant form. AIUI the r

Re: [POLICY][DOC] IP clearance process refinements

2006-03-19 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On 3/19/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sorry for the confusion: this is about the actual process of preparing > the paperwork required by the incubator not the receipt of the > software grant form. AIUI the receipt of the software grant form needs > an officer but an officer

Re: [POLICY][DOC] IP clearance process refinements

2006-03-19 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 3/19/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/19/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A few observations from following the process as currently documented > > and proposals for improvements: > > > > 1 this process can only be executed by a ASF member or office

Re: [POLICY][DOC] IP clearance process refinements

2006-03-19 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On 3/19/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A few observations from following the process as currently documented > and proposals for improvements: > > 1 this process can only be executed by a ASF member or officer with > incubator karma. this needs to be documented on the cleara

Re: [POLICY][DOC] IP clearance process refinements

2006-03-19 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 3/19/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mar 19, 2006, at 6:25 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote: > > > On 3/19/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 12:26:04PM +, robert burrell donkin > >> wrote: > > > > > > > >>> 3 there is no indication the

Re: [POLICY][DOC] IP clearance process refinements

2006-03-19 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Mar 19, 2006, at 6:25 AM, robert burrell donkin wrote: On 3/19/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 12:26:04PM +, robert burrell donkin wrote: 3 there is no indication the form which CLA's and CCLA's are relevant. this makes oversight difficult. PROP

Re: [POLICY][DOC] IP clearance process refinements

2006-03-19 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 3/19/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 12:26:04PM +, robert burrell donkin wrote: > > 3 there is no indication the form which CLA's and CCLA's are relevant. > > this makes oversight difficult. > > > > PROPOSAL: the form should include official names (as l

Re: [POLICY][DOC] IP clearance process refinements

2006-03-19 Thread Leo Simons
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 12:26:04PM +, robert burrell donkin wrote: > A few observations from following the process as currently documented > and proposals for improvements: > > 1 this process can only be executed by a ASF member or officer with > incubator karma. this needs to be documented on