No, absolutely my comment wasn't supposed to have any insinuation about
whether the project should get incubated or not from a proposal
perspective. It was just a round about way of saying, I like the proposal,
its fresh, looks sane and is something that's a bit different so it gets a
+1 from me.
That's a fair statement. In general, however, it isn't a concern of the
Incubator if a proposed podling have some sort of resemblance with some other
software out there. IINM, no one was rejected because they want to develop yet
another web-application server or something like this.
Cos
On Tue, M
I actually have an opinion!
I saw yet another database engine land and my heart sank
Then I did some digging into quickstep and realised it was more of a
"traditional" database that might take on the likes of Exasol etc rather
than plugging more SQL into NOSQL etc(from what I gather) and I am
It's been a week since this thread started and surprisingly there isn't any
reaction so far. Is it safe to assume the silent consensus has been reached?
Cos
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:52PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It is my pleasure to present the proposal to incubate the Quickstep proj
