On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Brian Spector
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> thanks for everyone's feedback and Sterling thank you for graciously coming
> on board as an additional mentor.
>
> I'd like to propose that the proposed Apache OpenMiracl incubation project
> be renamed to Apache Milagro.
>
> A
Hi Jan, thanks for your interest! :-)
To answer your question...
Already noted in the proposal for being donated is the baseline platform for
Milagro, which, on a high level, consists of the following:
Milagro libraries and tools consisting of:
- Distributed Key Management platform and se
On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 14:53:03 +
Jan Willem Janssen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On 10 Nov 2015, at 10:29, Nick Kew wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 01:33 +, Nick Kew wrote:
> >> I should like to propose that we consider OpenMiracl for
> >> incubation.
> >
> > This proposal is now at
> > https
Hi,
> On 10 Nov 2015, at 10:29, Nick Kew wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 01:33 +, Nick Kew wrote:
>> I should like to propose that we consider OpenMiracl for incubation.
>
> This proposal is now at
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenMiraclProposal
I’ve read the proposal with great in
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 07:43 +, Brian Spector wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> thanks for everyone's feedback and Sterling thank you for graciously coming
> on board as an additional mentor.
>
> I'd like to propose that the proposed Apache OpenMiracl incubation project
> be renamed to Apache Milagro.
Tha
Hi All,
thanks for everyone's feedback and Sterling thank you for graciously coming
on board as an additional mentor.
I'd like to propose that the proposed Apache OpenMiracl incubation project
be renamed to Apache Milagro.
A Milagro is a charm that is used to bring about a miracle, so the subtex
Hi Greg,
thanks for the input. We definitely appreciate it. We currently discussing that
internally and it’s great to hear from someone who has been through this. The
approach you tookwith HAWQ is quite interesting.
Thanks again,
Patrick
Patrick Hilt
Chief Technology Officer
MIRACL
> On No
Having been through this twice now with "Pivotal GemFire" begatting "Apache
Geode" and "Pivotal HAWQ" becoming "Apache HAWQ"
If the current owner intends to allow infringement on the MIRACL brand as a
policy by any user of Apache Miracl, then that should be ok. In effect
they will be putting
On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 08:48 +0900, Brian Spector wrote:
> Hi Alex, thank you for the suggestion, but from our point of view, as I
> outlined below, we would disadvantage the project as a whole by not having
> the MIRACL name in it.
>
> At the same time, I completely understand the concern that a c
Hi Alex, thank you for the suggestion, but from our point of view, as I
outlined below, we would disadvantage the project as a whole by not having
the MIRACL name in it.
At the same time, I completely understand the concern that a company who
creates a product based on OpenMiracl might feel themse
I am just a peanut in the peanut gallery, but if I wanted to create a
competing product based on OpenMiracl, I would feel disadvantaged by the
MIRACL brand because every time I attributed OpenMiracl it would be remind
folks of your brand.
Maybe you can name your Apache project something like “Good
Hi Shane,
given your role, I'm hoping you can make some suggestions to help us out of
this bind so we can move forward. It would really be appreciated.
As stated previously, 'OpenMiracl: A cryptosystem for cloud computing' is a
'proposed' Apache Project / platform name. MIRACL is the name of the
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015 15:21:02 -0500
Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Marvin Humphrey wrote on 11/13/15 9:27 AM:
>
> A key point here is: would other organizations be interested in having
> their employees contribute to the project? Or would other organizations
> likely see that your company effectively hel
Marvin Humphrey wrote on 11/13/15 9:27 AM:
> Hello, Brian,
>
> Thanks for collaborating with Nick and bringing this proposal to us!
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Brian Spector
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> among cryptographers in the embedded / IoT space, the 'MIRACL' brand has a
>> lot of h
Marvin Humphrey wrote on 11/11/15 12:42 AM:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
>
>>> The ASF project called OpenMiracl and Certivox/MIRACL continuing to use the
>>> MIRACL mark would seem to muddy the water between the two. Would this not
>>> disadvantage others building something
Hello, Brian,
Thanks for collaborating with Nick and bringing this proposal to us!
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Brian Spector
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> among cryptographers in the embedded / IoT space, the 'MIRACL' brand has a
> lot of household name recognition. Most degreed cryptographers have
Hi all,
among cryptographers in the embedded / IoT space, the 'MIRACL' brand has a
lot of household name recognition. Most degreed cryptographers have used it
in their research. Code from the open source library is in hardware from
Intel, Microsoft, Google, Siemens, Gemalto, etc.
When we started
Hi!
Definitely interesting points to consider… I have just discussed this with
Brian (MIracl CEO) and he’ll post some comments back and we can take it from
there.
Thanks for the input and support,
Patrick
---
Patrick Hilt
Chief Technology Officer
Certivox Ltd.
> On Nov 10, 2015, at 9:53 PM, Al
On 11/10/15, 9:37 PM, "Nick Kew" wrote:
>On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 04:38 +, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> In case it helps, when Adobe transferred the Flex trademark to the ASF,
>> the ASF licensed use of the Flex trademark back to Adobe so Adobe could
>> use Flex for its already-released versions and
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
>> The ASF project called OpenMiracl and Certivox/MIRACL continuing to use the
>> MIRACL mark would seem to muddy the water between the two. Would this not
>> disadvantage others building something based on OpenMiracl?
>
> Isn't it the same distinc
On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 04:38 +, Alex Harui wrote:
> In case it helps, when Adobe transferred the Flex trademark to the ASF,
> the ASF licensed use of the Flex trademark back to Adobe so Adobe could
> use Flex for its already-released versions and documentation.
Aha, that's interesting. The su
On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 00:35 +, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 01:33 +, Nick Kew wrote:
> > > I should like to propose that we consider OpenMiracl for incubation.
> >
> > This proposal is now at
> > https://wiki.apache.
On 11/10/15, 4:35 PM, "Niall Pemberton" wrote:
>
>"As soon as OpenMiracl is accepted into the Incubator, Certivox (now
>MIRACL) will transfer the source code and trademark to the ASF with a
>Software Grant, and licensed under the Apache License 2.0. Certivox/MIRACL
>retains rights to its existin
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 01:33 +, Nick Kew wrote:
> > I should like to propose that we consider OpenMiracl for incubation.
>
> This proposal is now at
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenMiraclProposal
"As soon as OpenMiracl is accepted i
On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 01:33 +, Nick Kew wrote:
> I should like to propose that we consider OpenMiracl for incubation.
This proposal is now at
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenMiraclProposal
--
Nick Kew
-
To unsubscrib
On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 01:33 +, Nick Kew wrote:
> [chop]
I need to declare my own interest here.
I first approached Certivox in search of solutions to the
problems of online identity, and made some suggestions.
They welcomed my interest, and I am now undertaking
development work for them on a
26 matches
Mail list logo
