> > Now, the only thing missing for it to be perfect, in my book,
> > is that it doesn't use maven to build... :)
> I'm not a maven expert. There's a pom that currently does not work
Par for the course. ;-) As long as it builds with Ant, people should be
happy.
--- Noel (reknowned Maven
> Scott Comer (sccomer) wrote:
> Have you looked at apache etch?
Yes, I now have looked at it. It's great.
It seems that Etch has a much broader scope than Jaffre ever will have.
If I understood it right, Etch comes with it's own interface description
language, and let's users the freedom to imp
Outside the WS-*, JAX-WS and JAX-RS there are at least Etch and Thrift
projects in a similar space. Those two projects are both
high-performant, light-weight and more importantly language/platform
inter-operable. Is there any particular advantage over these two
projects that you can see for Jaffre?
> Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
> could you provide some more technical background information
The idea is quite simple and certainly not new in the Java world: method
calls and return values are considered as data structures that are being
serialized for transport.
The data structures are
JaffreCall
Have you looked at apache etch?
-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Goeschl [mailto:siegfried.goes...@it20one.at]
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 05:09 AM Pacific Standard Time
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject:Re: Starting a new incubation
Hi Alexander,
could you
Hi Alexander,
could you provide some more technical background information
+) how does it compare to RMI, JSON or Hessian (http://hessian.caucho.com/)
Siegfried Goeschl
Alexander Veit wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to start an incubator project at the Apache Software Foundation
> with a Ja
This really looks cool and I surely would have evluated it for my
project, if available stable before two years.
Would hessian as a binary format be an option for Jaffre btw?
See: http://hessian.caucho.com/
its also released under ASL
I think Commons would benefit from this component and I would
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Alexander Veit wrote:
>> Sounds like RMI is probably not the best comparison point. How does
>> Jaffre differ from XML-RPC? Are there potential synergies with
>> projects like http://ws.apache.org/xmlrpc/?
>
> I'm not familiar with XML-RPC. The Jaffre wire format
> Santiago Gala wrote:
> I think it would be more appropriate as a "commons" component
> than in any other place. I liked the stress on "not having any
> dependence beyond the JRE" and "not being XML". Both play quite
> badly with WS-*, where the norm is using XML and having lots of
> (inter)depen
> Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Sounds interesting. Is the code already available online?
OK, I've made an ad hoc snapshot available for download:
http://www.jaffre.org/
It's pre alpha. But the samples and also some test cases should work ;)
> Sounds like RMI is probably not the best comparison point.
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Santiago Gala wrote:
> El mié, 18-03-2009 a las 11:40 +0100, Jukka Zitting escribió:
>> Sounds like RMI is probably not the best comparison point. How does
>> Jaffre differ from XML-RPC? Are there potential synergies with
>> projects like http://ws.apache.org/
El mié, 18-03-2009 a las 11:40 +0100, Jukka Zitting escribió:
> Hi,
>
> Sounds interesting. Is the code already available online?
>
> Sounds like RMI is probably not the best comparison point. How does
> Jaffre differ from XML-RPC? Are there potential synergies with
> projects like http://ws.apac
Hi,
Sounds interesting. Is the code already available online?
Sounds like RMI is probably not the best comparison point. How does
Jaffre differ from XML-RPC? Are there potential synergies with
projects like http://ws.apache.org/xmlrpc/?
BR,
Jukka Zitting
---
> Jaffre does not need skeletons/stubs. The endpoints are pojos, parameters
> and return values are java.io.Serializable objects.
>
> No registry is required.
>
> Jaffre Connectors listen well-defined ports that can easily be bound to a
> specific address. They are firewall friendly.
>
> An exp
> Marcel Offermans wrote:
>
> Out of interest, if it's a simplified kind of RMI, what are
> the tradeoffs for using RMI vs using Jaffre?
Jaffre does not need skeletons/stubs. The endpoints are pojos, parameters
and return values are java.io.Serializable objects.
No registry is required.
Jaffre
On Mar 17, 2009, at 22:54 , Alexander Veit wrote:
Two, it sounds like your project is related to the
web services world. So check out the projects under
the Apache WS umbrella (http://ws.apache.org/), and
also Apache CXF.
Yes, there are similarities to web services.
However, Jaffre neither d
Hi Thilo,
Thank you very much for your answer.
> Thilo Goetz wrote:
>
> there are two things I'd advise you to do.
>
> One, put up a project proposal in the incubator wiki:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
> You can also look at older proposals there. There is
> no need to do this all at on
Alexander Veit wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to start an incubator project at the Apache Software Foundation
> with a Java library (let's call it Jaffre) I've written.
>
> Jaffre is a lightweight RPC library for the Java platform.
> It is designed to be simple, extensible, robust, and effi
18 matches
Mail list logo
