On 07/04/2015 04:53 PM, Stefan Reich wrote:
> How about taking something good that WANTS TO EXIST, and supporting that?
I didn't know that software was sentient.
If you meant "software that somebody wants to exist", I can point you to
thousands of projects that got no further than a name, a prop
On 4 July 2015 at 18:53, Stefan Reich <
stefan.reich.maker.of@googlemail.com> wrote:
> You wait for something to exist, and THEN you support it?
>
> How about taking something good that WANTS TO EXIST, and supporting that?
>
Well it is hard to imagine something that wants to exist. Normally it
On 07/06/2015 11:08 AM, Alan R Williams wrote:
I think it is about Stefan's wish for Apache to become the home for
JavaX http://javax.tinybrain.de/
See
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201505.mbox/%3CCAC2-jLHrU67-6hSOXMoidADe%2BeE_KSRfjzY07o1wtiG%2BL0dfwQ%40mail.gmail
I think it is about Stefan's wish for Apache to become the home for
JavaX http://javax.tinybrain.de/
See
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201505.mbox/%3CCAC2-jLHrU67-6hSOXMoidADe%2BeE_KSRfjzY07o1wtiG%2BL0dfwQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
for the original discussion.
Alan
On
Gmail marks Stefan Reich's messages as spam as they don't pass all sender
domain checks. That makes following this thread a bit difficult.
2015-07-06 10:52 GMT-04:00 Rich Bowen :
> I presume, since your message has received responses, that it's clear to
> *someone* what you're talking about. To t
I presume, since your message has received responses, that it's clear to
*someone* what you're talking about. To the rest of us, this feels like
a message that was either posted the wrong place, or simply lacks any
context whatsoever.
Can you either elaborate on what this rant is about, or tak
Hi again,
sorry, I was not clear enough when I mentioned time. I guess it did let
you think in the wrong direction. 3 years is time, yes, but what counts
is the work done and the diversity. What about contributors/committer?
You should come with a couple of people (4+) that can work actively o
Unfortunately you come across to me in the worst possible manner, not happy
with the status quo and only complaining.
ASF works in a manner of;
a. Do-acracy. Don't expect anyone else but you to make the changes you want
to see.
b. Small reversible steps. Suggesting (and/or executing) very big cha
BTW I'm not even talking about payments.
I talk about *collaborating*.
And I do understand perfectly fine.
Stefan
Am 04.07.2015 19:26 schrieb "Jochen Theodorou" :
> Am 04.07.2015 18:53, schrieb Stefan Reich:
>
>> You wait for something to exist, and THEN you support it?
>>
>> How about taking s
Basic work for TinyBrain has been done. It's been at least 3 years.
Am 04.07.2015 19:26 schrieb "Jochen Theodorou" :
> Am 04.07.2015 18:53, schrieb Stefan Reich:
>
>> You wait for something to exist, and THEN you support it?
>>
>> How about taking something good that WANTS TO EXIST, and supporting
Stefan,
In the couple of months since you first suggested that JavaX might become an
Apache Project, there have been many discussions about new projects entering
the incubator. There are also many completed and accepted proposals for
incubating projects. Have you observed any of that?
Have y
On 04-Jul-15 17:53, Stefan Reich wrote:
You wait for something to exist, and THEN you support it?
How about taking something good that WANTS TO EXIST, and supporting that?
Outside of science fiction, software itself does not WANT TO EXIST.
There must be people who want it to exist and then st
Am 04.07.2015 18:53, schrieb Stefan Reich:
You wait for something to exist, and THEN you support it?
How about taking something good that WANTS TO EXIST, and supporting that?
Stefan, you sill don't understand that the ASF is basically a bunch of
people supporting open source in their free tim
13 matches
Mail list logo
