Re: Board response to January Report on Heraldry

2007-02-01 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 02:25, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Reset to a monthly reporting requirement. Set the bar > at three months from now to bring development to the list.  If that does > not happen, flush it. After reading the refered mail archive, I agree with the above. IMO, give the

Re: Board response to January Report on Heraldry

2007-01-31 Thread Alex Karasulu
Ted Leung wrote: On Jan 29, 2007, at 10:49 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: The ASF Board, by Cliff Schmidt, wrote: The report on Heraldry mentions a "single large block checkin" Two large block check-ins in January. One for python, one for ruby. It seems as if most of the development is happe

Re: Board response to January Report on Heraldry

2007-01-31 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On 1/31/07, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jan 30, 2007, at 8:24 AM, Ted Leung wrote: > Paul and I are about at our wit's end on what to do here, besides > upping the number of messages that say "please talk to us on the > list". When you need to say that more than once every three mon

Re: Board response to January Report on Heraldry

2007-01-30 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > Bill, do you have some cycles to spare helping out with this project? I'll periodically poke my nose in to help - but it won't be in the next three weeks. I'll certainly observe enough to offer them some thoughts for their 1/month report updates, in terms of moving thi

RE: Board response to January Report on Heraldry

2007-01-30 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Ted Leung wrote: > > Clearly there needs to be some corrective action, and more guidance > > on how an ASF project is supposed to conduct itself. > That's not much of a plan, which is what the board is asking for. Perhaps not, but it got folks talking. :-) > Paul and I are about at our wit's e

Re: Board response to January Report on Heraldry

2007-01-30 Thread Leo Simons
Hey Ted, Bottom line: there's some issues with the heraldry community to fix, it's their responsibility to fix it, looks like you guys did a good job of that so far to me, we should give heraldry some more time to try and fix things. On Jan 30, 2007, at 8:24 AM, Ted Leung wrote: Paul and

RE: Board response to January Report on Heraldry

2007-01-30 Thread Recordon, David
--Original Message- From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 11:18 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: heraldry-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Board response to January Report on Heraldry Recordon, David wrote: > Hi all, > As Ted men

Re: Board response to January Report on Heraldry

2007-01-30 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
+1 to giving them a second chance. Sanjiva. On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 12:25 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > Sorry to be blunt. "Can it!" - That's what we did with TSIK. There's > > no point continuing incubation. We are not here to serve the interests > > of parties/

Re: Board response to January Report on Heraldry

2007-01-30 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Recordon, David wrote: > Hi all, > As Ted mentioned there was a thread started yesterday by Kevin Turner ( > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-heraldry-dev/200701.m > box/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) about how JanRain really > is now committed to moving all of their work into the Heraldry pr

RE: Board response to January Report on Heraldry

2007-01-30 Thread Recordon, David
t give up now. I really think it would be a shame to kill the project today when there now actually is a light starting to flicker at the end of the tunnel. --David -Original Message- From: Ted Leung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 11:25 PM To: general@incubator.ap

Re: Board response to January Report on Heraldry

2007-01-30 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Sorry to be blunt. "Can it!" - That's what we did with TSIK. There's > no point continuing incubation. We are not here to serve the interests > of parties/corporations. Dims - I agree with you, with fair warning. It's clear that the committers and actual authors are stil

Re: Board response to January Report on Heraldry

2007-01-30 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Sorry to be blunt. "Can it!" - That's what we did with TSIK. There's no point continuing incubation. We are not here to serve the interests of parties/corporations. thanks, dims On 1/30/07, Ted Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jan 29, 2007, at 10:49 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > The ASF Boa

Re: Board response to January Report on Heraldry

2007-01-29 Thread Ted Leung
On Jan 29, 2007, at 10:49 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: The ASF Board, by Cliff Schmidt, wrote: The report on Heraldry mentions a "single large block checkin" Two large block check-ins in January. One for python, one for ruby. It seems as if most of the development is happening off-line a

RE: Board response to January Report on Heraldry

2007-01-29 Thread Noel J. Bergman
The ASF Board, by Cliff Schmidt, wrote: > The report on Heraldry mentions a "single large block checkin" Two large block check-ins in January. One for python, one for ruby. It seems as if most of the development is happening off-line and being committed by proxy. Paul Querna posted one message