Hi,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> Gav... wrote:
>> Having licenses in place for all source files (not generated) and/or
>> exclusions I should think would be a requirement for release approval, I'd
>> prefer others to clarify that though.
>
> I think it's a good practic
Gav... wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Eddie Epstein [mailto:eaepst...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, 24 January 2010 11:52 PM
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA 2.3.0-rc9
>>
>> Hi, sure.
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Eddie Epstein [mailto:eaepst...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, 24 January 2010 11:52 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA 2.3.0-rc9
>
> Hi, sure.
> The unapproved licenses for each package are:
>
Eddie Epstein wrote:
Hi, sure.
The unapproved licenses for each package are:
Linux source - 17 unknown:
7 - regression and sample test data
6 - auto generated files (gnumake and JNI header)
1 - NOTICE file for binary package (with suffix)
1 - README file for binary package (with suffix)
Hi, sure.
The unapproved licenses for each package are:
Linux source - 17 unknown:
7 - regression and sample test data
6 - auto generated files (gnumake and JNI header)
1 - NOTICE file for binary package (with suffix)
1 - README file for binary package (with suffix)
1 - doxygen html temp
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> since I reviewed the earliest uima releases I went ahead and reviewed
> this one.
>
> I did not take the time to unpack files and examine them because I was
> convinced by early release rounds that the UIMA project knows how to
> do this reliably.
>
> I did focus on the
Eddie Epstein wrote:
Hi Jean,
Just noting that uimacpp does include rat reports, just poorly named :(
In http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.3.0-RC9/uimacpp/
are 5 xxx-report.txt files that correspond to the 5 uimacpp download packages
in the release.
And although not ide
Hi Jean,
Just noting that uimacpp does include rat reports, just poorly named :(
In http://people.apache.org/~schor/uima-release-candidates/2.3.0-RC9/uimacpp/
are 5 xxx-report.txt files that correspond to the 5 uimacpp download packages
in the release.
And although not identical to the previous
since I reviewed the earliest uima releases I went ahead and reviewed
this one.
I did not take the time to unpack files and examine them because I was
convinced by early release rounds that the UIMA project knows how to do
this reliably.
I did focus on the rat reports that were included and
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Bernd Fondermann
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 21:08, ant elder wrote:
>> It is quite huge. I haven't looked at every artifact but the ones i
>> did all the licensing etc looked ok and it looks like they understand
>> what they're doing. The copyright in some N
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 21:08, ant elder wrote:
> It is quite huge. I haven't looked at every artifact but the ones i
> did all the licensing etc looked ok and it looks like they understand
> what they're doing. The copyright in some NOTICE files is "Copyright
> 2006, 2007" which could probably d
Thanks! I appreciate your taking the time to do the review. -Marshall
ant elder wrote:
> It is quite huge. I haven't looked at every artifact but the ones i
> did all the licensing etc looked ok and it looks like they understand
> what they're doing. The copyright in some NOTICE files is "Copyri
It is quite huge. I haven't looked at every artifact but the ones i
did all the licensing etc looked ok and it looks like they understand
what they're doing. The copyright in some NOTICE files is "Copyright
2006, 2007" which could probably do with being updated, though others
are 2009 and from the
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Others, please review and vote! The release is pretty complex so it's
> a bit of work to review it, but it would be great if at least two
> other IPMC members could spare some time on this.
Anyone?
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> Please cast your vote!
My +1 from uima-dev@ stands here as well.
Others, please review and vote! The release is pretty complex so it's
a bit of work to review it, but it would be great if at least two
other IPMC members could spare so
15 matches
Mail list logo
