Noel J. Bergman wrote on Tuesday, September 14, 2004 12:17 AM:
> As with all of the other messages I've seen so far, I agree with
> switching the incubator CVS module to SVN, and making Subversion a
> strong recommendation, but not a requirement, for projects.
+1, excellent plan!
---
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 03:17:16AM -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> As with all of the other messages I've seen so far, I agree with switching
> the incubator CVS module to SVN, and making Subversion a strong
> recommendation, but not a requirement, for projects.
+1, all parts.
--
Greg Stein, htt
As with all of the other messages I've seen so far, I agree with switching
the incubator CVS module to SVN, and making Subversion a strong
recommendation, but not a requirement, for projects.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e
From: "Jim Jagielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 4:02 PM
> > Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> >
> >> I propose that we switch the Incubator repository to SVN.
[...]
> Agreed. -1 as a requirement; +1 as a recommendation.
Ditto.
Sander
--
On Sep 13, 2004, at 9:31 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
I propose that we switch the Incubator repository to SVN.
+1
Aditionally, I wanted to see what others think in making SVN a
requirement for all new podlings entering the Incubator
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> I propose that we switch the Incubator repository to SVN.
+1
> Aditionally, I wanted to see what others think in making SVN a
> requirement for all new podlings entering the Incubator.
- -1 as a requirement, +1 as a strong recomme
On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 03:40, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> I propose that we switch the Incubator repository to SVN.
>
> Aditionally, I wanted to see what others think in making SVN a
> requirement for all new podlings entering the Incubator. IT would
> certainly make it easier to keep track of pe
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> > Aditionally, I wanted to see what others think in making SVN a
> > requirement for all new podlings entering the Incubator. IT would
> > certainly make it easier to keep track of permissions across all
> > Incubator-dependant repositories
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
Oh, SpamAssassin is not in the incubator any more, but boy, SVN is MUCH
MUCH better than CVS. I highly recommend it.
I definitely wasn't referring to the SVN *server*, which I would surely
enjoy. I am talking about tools and integration.
Jochen
--
http://lilypie.com/baby1/0
Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It is quite reasonable, that this will change over the next year. But,
> as the situation is now, I would consider it a pain to use SVN in
> everydays work. That is also the reason, where I do not support
> switching to SVN in the Apache projects, I
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Aditionally, I wanted to see what others think in making SVN a
requirement for all new podlings entering the Incubator. IT would
certainly make it easier to keep track of permissions across all
Incubator-dependant repositories.
I still do believe, that SVN isn't suffici
11 matches
Mail list logo