Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 11/14/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thanks, I withdraw my -1.
>
> Ditto. -- justin
Heh - we had no -1 to withdraw, I agreed with you Justin that lazy
concensus is wrong, but we hadn't put a -1 to the actual release.
That's why I replied to your no
On 11/14/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks, I withdraw my -1.
Ditto. -- justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11/14/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henri wrote:
> you need 3 PMC votes to release (or add a committer).
> You currently have 1 (Robert's).
Two. Dims voted tonight.
Since one vote was missing, I took the time to review the packages, and they
appear to have the necessary d
Henri wrote:
> you need 3 PMC votes to release (or add a committer).
> You currently have 1 (Robert's).
Two. Dims voted tonight.
Since one vote was missing, I took the time to review the packages, and they
appear to have the necessary disclaimer, etc., although the information in
the .WAR file
On Nov 14, 2006, at 3:03 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Probably. -1 is nice and bombastic and makes people pay attention (rob
me of my drama why don't you!).
Apologies ;-)
Said -1 is withdrawn when the vote is complete.
'nuff said.
Craig
Hen
On 11/14/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+1 frome me. (belated)
On 11/14/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Probably. -1 is nice and bombastic and makes people pay attention (rob
me of my drama why don't you!).
Said -1 is withdrawn when the vote is complete.
Hen
On 11/14/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
Probably. -1 is nice and bombastic and makes people pay attention (rob
me of my drama why don't you!).
Said -1 is withdrawn when the vote is complete.
Hen
On 11/14/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Henri,
Point of order.
I don't believe that you really are voting -1 on the re
Hi Henri,
Point of order.
I don't believe that you really are voting -1 on the release. Rather,
you are pointing out that the vote is incomplete until 3 binding
votes of the Incubator PMC are received. I think there is a big
difference...
Craig
On Nov 14, 2006, at 2:43 PM, Henri Yandell
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 11/14/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> More than 72 hours have passed, and presumably everybody on the
>> incubator PMC that cares to vote has done so (Thanks Robert!). Please
>> proceed with the release.
>>
>> If anybody objects to this process, point them
On 11/14/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
More than 72 hours have passed, and presumably everybody on the
incubator PMC that cares to vote has done so (Thanks Robert!). Please
proceed with the release.
If anybody objects to this process, point them my way.
-1.
We don't release based o
-1 on the release.
The simple rule is - you need 3 PMC votes to release (or add a committer).
You currently have 1 (Robert's). That should be enough if Sam and Dims
(your mentors) vote; however they currently haven't voted on either
the [EMAIL PROTECTED] thread or the original.
Hen
On 11/14/06
11 matches
Mail list logo
