Am 07.06.2011 07:49, schrieb Christian Grobmeier:
>
...
>
> With OOo the company was nasty and people went away and were happy.
> The company wants the project at the ASF, and some people complain
> now.
I think it's far more complex and dates back very long. (see below)
> After all I never reall
Christian Grobmeier schreef:
>> We didn't balk when Geronimo was proposed, despite complaints from
>> JBoss.
>> We didn't balk when Felix (nee Oscar) was proposed. Â We didn't balk in
>> other
>> cases. Â We have never picked winners, we have incubated projects and
>> let the
>> community pick the
On 7 June 2011 06:49, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
With OOo the company was nasty and people went away and were happy.
> The company wants the project at the ASF, and some people complain
> now. After all I never really heard the words "I want it at the ASF"
> from somebody with OOo adress
I have
> We didn't balk when Geronimo was proposed, despite complaints from JBoss.
> We didn't balk when Felix (nee Oscar) was proposed. We didn't balk in other
> cases. We have never picked winners, we have incubated projects and let the
> community pick the winners. I don't see a reason to change our
Hi,
Jochen Wiedmann wrote on 2011-06-06 23.10:
Niclas, several people from TDF/LO, including Florian Effenberger,
have expressed their wish that the project should be accepted on this
mailing list. Simple reason: They consider the alternatives (code
stays within Oracle or whatever else) worse t
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> For the record; I am opposing this contribution and will vote -1,
> unless there is a clear indication that TDF/LO is behind it 100% and
> the two projects are on a trajectory of a merge.
Niclas, several people from TDF/LO, including Flori
om: Niclas Hedhman
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, June 6, 2011 4:47:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Question to TDF and its community
>
> Thank you both for (what I perceive as) balanced responses, without
> all the noise out there.
>
> For the record; I am opposing
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> For the record; I am opposing this contribution and will vote -1,
> unless there is a clear indication that TDF/LO is behind it 100% and
> the two projects are on a trajectory of a merge.
I urge TDF to participate, but their participation should not be a
prerequisite for u
Thank you both for (what I perceive as) balanced responses, without
all the noise out there.
For the record; I am opposing this contribution and will vote -1,
unless there is a clear indication that TDF/LO is behind it 100% and
the two projects are on a trajectory of a merge. I don't want to see
A
Hi Niclas,
Niclas Hedhman wrote on 2011-06-06 18.12:
I was on a long flight and came back to an immense number of mails
here and elsewhere on this topic, so please bear with me if this has
been brought up before, by someone else.
hope you had a safte trip, and I can feel with you - I had seve
On 6 June 2011 17:12, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Was it already at that time known that Oracle was going with a liberal
> license, and the fork was then a choice based in the ideological
> differences in licensing?
>
> If it was not, how would the people who forked then have reacted if
> Oracle did th
Dear TDFers,
I was on a long flight and came back to an immense number of mails
here and elsewhere on this topic, so please bear with me if this has
been brought up before, by someone else.
I vaguely recall the fork of OOo into LibreOffice, and if memory
serves me right it was due to escape Orac
12 matches
Mail list logo
