On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> I am asking what the process should be for a podling accepting further
> donations of code. Seems to me they should be following the normal IP
> process that a PMC would.
That's kind of what my reply was, wasn't it?
Thanks,
Roman.
--
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:43 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
> > The process for accept a podling and the initial code base is pretty
> clear,
> > since it undergoes an IPMC vote.
> >
> > But what happens when there are additional chunks of
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> The process for accept a podling and the initial code base is pretty clear,
> since it undergoes an IPMC vote.
>
> But what happens when there are additional chunks of code donated during
> incubation? Is that OK under the original IPMC vot
The process for accept a podling and the initial code base is pretty clear,
since it undergoes an IPMC vote.
But what happens when there are additional chunks of code donated during
incubation? Is that OK under the original IPMC vote and the grant just
needs recording with the secretary or should
