Benson Margulies wrote on 06/02/2011 09:19:32 PM:
>
> The proposal, as I read it, doesn't address the license status of
> third party software dependencies.
>
I'll get something into the proposal on the wiki. I think someone has
mistaken the "external dependencies" section as meaning infrastr
The proposal, as I read it, doesn't address the license status of
third party software dependencies.
The one time that I endeavoured to build OOo from source, it had a
long list of mandatory dependencies.
Reference http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html.
While some of them might qualify as 'p
