On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:09 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:07 AM Greg Stein wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> >...
>>
>> > I'm a bit bothered by the fact that this would mean that the community
>> > voted on one resolution and then a different
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:07 AM Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> >...
>
> > I'm a bit bothered by the fact that this would mean that the community
> > voted on one resolution and then a different resolution is constructed
> > anew for the board to approve.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>...
> I'm a bit bothered by the fact that this would mean that the community
> voted on one resolution and then a different resolution is constructed
> anew for the board to approve. But at the moment, I'm not sure how to
> solve that problem.
>
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 2:32 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Oct 23, 2015 1:01 AM, "Sam Ruby" wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> > On Oct 22, 2015 9:57 AM, "Sam Ruby" wrote:
>> >>...
>> >> I've also opened another issue that I would appreciate feedback on:
>> >>
>> >
On Oct 23, 2015 1:01 AM, "Sam Ruby" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> > On Oct 22, 2015 9:57 AM, "Sam Ruby" wrote:
> >>...
> >> I've also opened another issue that I would appreciate feedback on:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-28
> >
> > Cro
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Oct 22, 2015 9:57 AM, "Sam Ruby" wrote:
>>...
>> I've also opened another issue that I would appreciate feedback on:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-28
>
> Cross-check is nice.
>
> I'd suggest another possibility: a web t
Agreed, it would likely make more sense for the entire doc to be a
template, with only a few variables and maybe a single check indicating
they want bylaws or not.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:17 PM Greg Stein wrote:
> On Oct 22, 2015 9:57 AM, "Sam Ruby" wrote:
> >...
> > I've also opened another
On Oct 22, 2015 9:57 AM, "Sam Ruby" wrote:
>...
> I've also opened another issue that I would appreciate feedback on:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIMSY-28
Cross-check is nice.
I'd suggest another possibility: a web tool to *add* a template-based
resolution in the first place.
Che
Indeed, if Hadrian had succeeded in editing during the meeting, it would
have been fixed right then. Murphy weighed in and we have a 4 week delay.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:03 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> Ah ha. It wasn't clear from the original email this happened during the
> board meeting.
Indeed, the month delay in consideration is exactly an opportunity to
correct the resolutions technical defects.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> I was a reply to your message, but it was not pointed at you. Seriously.
> Maybe the "curious" part a bit, bec
Hi John,
I was a reply to your message, but it was not pointed at you. Seriously.
Maybe the "curious" part a bit, because you asked. We know however from
experience that there are many other people who are curious what happens
when unusual events like this take place and even a few, as I calle
On Oct 22, 2015 8:05 AM, "Hadrian Zbarcea" wrote:
>
> For the curious and conspiracy theorists :) let me complete the picture.
>
> I did actually attend the board meeting as I usually do and the board was
gracious enough to give me a couple of minutes to correct the resolution.
Unfortunately, whim
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> For the curious and conspiracy theorists :) let me complete the picture.
>
> I did actually attend the board meeting as I usually do and the board was
> gracious enough to give me a couple of minutes to correct the resolution.
> Unfortunate
Hi Hadrian, All,
We have acquired a lot of familiarity with the challenges of the due
processes and also their importance. We in the Brooklyn community
understand completely and we really appreciate all the assistance we are
getting.
I suggest we still look to release an 0.9.0 around the b
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> For the curious and conspiracy theorists :) let me complete the picture.
>
> I did actually attend the board meeting as I usually do and the board was
> gracious enough to give me a couple of minutes to correct the resolution.
> Unfortunate
For the curious and conspiracy theorists :) let me complete the picture.
I did actually attend the board meeting as I usually do and the board
was gracious enough to give me a couple of minutes to correct the
resolution. Unfortunately, whimsy wouldn't save the corrected
resolution, for a reaso
Ah ha. It wasn't clear from the original email this happened during the
board meeting. Now I get it.
On Oct 21, 2015 23:09, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:58 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
>
> > I think that's my point. Those two weeks should be used to get incubator
> > app
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:43 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Any reason you need 4 weeks to add the paragraph back?..
4 weeks is to get the board to vote on the resolution - our meeting
was yesterday and the next one is on November 18.
As Hadrian says, It is unfortunate that nobody caught that, we no
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:58 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> I think that's my point. Those two weeks should be used to get incubator
> approval. If you wait 4 weeks you don't graduate until December.
The Incubator isn't going to vote again. The text of the graduation
resolution from an Incubator
On Oct 21, 2015 22:48, "Greg Stein" wrote:
>
> Several things: the description of the project in para 1 and 3 do not
> match. Second, the wording of the (current) last paragraph doesn't refer
to
> "podling" like other Incubator graduation resolutions. Third, the final
> paragraph from the template
Several things: the description of the project in para 1 and 3 do not
match. Second, the wording of the (current) last paragraph doesn't refer to
"podling" like other Incubator graduation resolutions. Third, the final
paragraph from the template, releasing the Incubator from responsibility.
See th
Any reason you need 4 weeks to add the paragraph back?
On Oct 21, 2015 21:09, "Hadrian Zbarcea" wrote:
> The resolution to graduate Apache Brooklyn out of the incubator was tabled
> due to a procedural issue. This has nothing to do with the code or the
> community.
>
> The reason was an editorial
The resolution to graduate Apache Brooklyn out of the incubator was
tabled due to a procedural issue. This has nothing to do with the code
or the community.
The reason was an editorial error on my side, I used the wrong template
and the last paragraph releasing the incubator from its responsib
23 matches
Mail list logo
