On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...Does anyone from Bluesky care to comment and/or act on this?..
See replies on the bluesky dev list,
http://markmail.org/message/rdsuudsaspqanlla
-Bertrand
Does anyone from Bluesky care to comment and/or act on this?
IMO the bluesky website needs to be fixed *immediately*, by removing
all download links and misleading license-related statements.
-Bertrand
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 10:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While reviewing the BlueSky podling website, I noticed the following issues :
>
> - The BlueSky podling website have a download page, that is pointing
> to non-apache bluesky released artifacts. I think this is at least
On 7/31/08, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Andrus Adamchik
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 31, 2008, at 4:18 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>>
>> - The BlueSky podling website have a download page, that is pointing
>>> to non-apache bluesky relea
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> On Jul 31, 2008, at 4:18 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>
> - The BlueSky podling website have a download page, that is pointing
>> to non-apache bluesky released artifacts. I think this is at least
>> very confusing, as i
On Jul 31, 2008, at 4:18 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
- The BlueSky podling website have a download page, that is pointing
to non-apache bluesky released artifacts. I think this is at least
very confusing, as it can allude users to think this is a endorsed ASF
release. Is this OK ?
I don't see
While reviewing the BlueSky podling website, I noticed the following issues :
- The BlueSky podling website have a download page, that is pointing
to non-apache bluesky released artifacts. I think this is at least
very confusing, as it can allude users to think this is a endorsed ASF
release. Is t
