Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> As I wrote in the commit doc, I regard Mentor as more a counselor, and
> Shepherd as a a guide. Hence I think that Mentor is both more
> appropriate for the name and more understandable.
> (KenC seems to prefer it too IIRC)
correct.
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sana
Mentor is preferable to me, too. :-) It is understood in technology
circles, and has a different connotation than Shephard. The project has to
mature, and develop as a Community, rather than a flock of coding sheep.
People might perceive a Shephard as someone who will "do it" for them, which
is
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Nicola and others,
I note in the DraftPolicy document you have done a s/shepherd/mentor/g.
Is this our final call on the title for these people? I.e. should I
make the same change to the Process Description?
As I wrote in the commit doc, I regard Mentor as more a counsel
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 19:46:21 -0700
(Subject: Re: Mentor vs. Shepherd)
"Roy T. Fielding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The ASF loves the Greek Myth :-) Mentor was Odysseus's good teacher and
> > mental supporter. I prefer Mentor to Shepherd.
> Er, the ASF rar
The ASF loves the Greek Myth :-) Mentor was Odysseus's good teacher and
mental supporter. I prefer Mentor to Shepherd.
Er, the ASF rarely speaks with one voice -- Stefano loves the Greek
Myth,
and the rest of us just tolerate it because we like Stefano. ;-)
Personally, I prefer Shepherd, since o
other words?
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 10:51:23 +1000
(Subject: Mentor vs. Shepherd)
Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nicola and others,
>
> I note in the DraftPolicy document you have done a s/shepherd/mentor/g.
>
> Is this our final call on the title for these pe
Nicola and others,
I note in the DraftPolicy document you have done a s/shepherd/mentor/g.
Is this our final call on the title for these people? I.e. should I
make the same change to the Process Description?
Cheers,
Berin
