Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Perhaps a better solution is an incubator sandbox for code
Or just a directory called "dormant" into which to do an svn move.
+1 - Simple Solution.
+1; create a category on the Incubating projects list called D
On 2/20/09, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
>>> Perhaps a better solution is an incubator sandbox for code
>>
>> Or just a directory called "dormant" into which to do an svn move.
>
> +1 - Simple Solution.
The name is not important but the reason
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> Perhaps a better solution is an incubator sandbox for code
>
> Or just a directory called "dormant" into which to do an svn move.
+1 - Simple Solution.
--
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> At Wed's ASF Board meeting, the board took up the issue of whether
> the attic project's charter is appropriate for incubating code
> The conclusion was no
I could have told you that, too, if anyone had asked.
> Perhaps a better solution is an incubator sandbox for
At Wed's ASF Board meeting, the board took up the issue of whether
the attic project's charter is appropriate for incubating code that
has not yet graduated into a project.
The conclusion was no; the attic is chartered to handle the actual
projects of the foundation (including incubator *graduate
