Apache PhotArk will be a complete open source photo gallery
application including a content repository for the images, a display
piece, an access control layer, and upload capabilities. The idea is
to have a rigid design for the content repository with a very flexible
display piece. The images in t
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Tim Williams wrote:
>
> I have a need for something like this coming up and have been
> passively looking at PhotArk. I'd suggest that a project like this
> would do itself good by having a simple architecture diagram[1], some
> good screenshots[2], and an ounce of
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:59 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
>>> Based on the current active members of the community, it's then going
>>> to be hard to get this release out !!!
>>
>> If by community you mean the IP
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:59 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
>> Based on the current active members of the community, it's then going
>> to be hard to get this release out !!!
>
> If by community you mean the IPMC, then the lack of response is
> perhaps because AFAICT there
On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:33 PM, sebb wrote:
> > On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:42 PM, sebb wrote:
> >> > On 04/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
> >> >> A new RC is now available which should fix the items mentioned
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:33 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:42 PM, sebb wrote:
>> > On 04/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
>> >> A new RC is now available which should fix the items mentioned, please
>> >> see details below :
>> >
>> > Loo
On 08/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:42 PM, sebb wrote:
> > On 04/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
> >> A new RC is now available which should fix the items mentioned, please
> >> see details below :
> >
> > Looks OK now - the issues I raised have been fixed, tha
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:42 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 04/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
>> A new RC is now available which should fix the items mentioned, please
>> see details below :
>
> Looks OK now - the issues I raised have been fixed, thanks.
This is great news, thanks for all your effort hel
On 04/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
> A new RC is now available which should fix the items mentioned, please
> see details below :
Looks OK now - the issues I raised have been fixed, thanks.
> ---
>
>
> The artifacts are available for review at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende/phota
A new RC is now available which should fix the items mentioned, please
see details below :
---
The artifacts are available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~lresende/photark/M1-incubating-RC4a/
This includes the signed binary and source distributions, the RAT report,
and the Maven staging
On 02/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
> A new RC is now available, please see details below :
>
> ---
> Please review and vote on the M1-incubating release artifacts of PhotArk.
>
>
> The artifacts are available for review at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende/photark/M1-incubating-RC4/
S
A new RC is now available, please see details below :
---
Please review and vote on the M1-incubating release artifacts of PhotArk.
The artifacts are available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~lresende/photark/M1-incubating-RC4/
This includes the signed binary and source distributions, t
On 02/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:52 AM, sebb wrote:
> > On 02/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
> >>
>
> >> I did a cross-check to make sure only the used dependencies were
> >> mentioned in the LICENSE and got the notices sniptes from these
> >> required depen
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:52 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 02/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
>>
>> I did a cross-check to make sure only the used dependencies were
>> mentioned in the LICENSE and got the notices sniptes from these
>> required dependencies. Do you see a specific piece that should be
>> re
On 02/09/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:57 PM, sebb wrote:
> > On 31/08/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
> >> Thanks for all the reviews and feedback for the PhotArk RC2. I have
> >> fixed all the severe and blocking issues and have produced a new RC...
> >>
> >> Pleas
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:57 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 31/08/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
>> Thanks for all the reviews and feedback for the PhotArk RC2. I have
>> fixed all the severe and blocking issues and have produced a new RC...
>>
>> Please follow the link below for the new RC details :
>>
>>
On 31/08/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
> Thanks for all the reviews and feedback for the PhotArk RC2. I have
> fixed all the severe and blocking issues and have produced a new RC...
>
> Please follow the link below for the new RC details :
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/photark-...@incubator.ap
Thanks for all the reviews and feedback for the PhotArk RC2. I have
fixed all the severe and blocking issues and have produced a new RC...
Please follow the link below for the new RC details :
http://www.mail-archive.com/photark-...@incubator.apache.org/msg00145.html
Thanks
--
Luciano Resende
On 22/08/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:16 PM, sebb wrote:
> > Sigs and hashes OK; tgz and zip agree with each other.
> >
> > However, the source archive does not agree with the SVN tag - the
> > versions are different in various pom.xml files.
>
>
> Can you give me o
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:16 PM, sebb wrote:
> Sigs and hashes OK; tgz and zip agree with each other.
>
> However, the source archive does not agree with the SVN tag - the
> versions are different in various pom.xml files.
Can you give me one example ? The verious pom.xml should have version
id as
On 20/08/2009, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> > Apache PhotArk will be a complete open source photo gallery
> > application including a content repository for the images, a display
> > piece, an access control layer, and upload capabilities. T
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> Apache PhotArk will be a complete open source photo gallery
> application including a content repository for the images, a display
> piece, an access control layer, and upload capabilities. The idea is
> to have a rigid design for the conten
Apache PhotArk will be a complete open source photo gallery
application including a content repository for the images, a display
piece, an access control layer, and upload capabilities. The idea is
to have a rigid design for the content repository with a very flexible
display piece. The images in t
Apache PhotArk will be a complete open source photo gallery
application including a content repository for the images, a display
piece, an access control layer, and upload capabilities. The idea is
to have a rigid design for the content repository with a very flexible
display piece. The images in t
24 matches
Mail list logo
