People act when they have a personal motivation to do so. There's no
boss telling people to do things around here.
Therefore, there's no sense in which we have two few people, we just
have too few people interested in engaging with specific projects.
Interest can be both practical (the project is
On 24 January 2013 18:52, Benson Margulies wrote:
> If you model the IPMC as a group of volunteers who have collectively
> volunteered to mentor and supervise new projects, then the current
> situation strongly suggests that we have either too many projects or
> not enough volunteers. Calling peo
Hi !
On 1/24/13, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
[...]
>
> So, in my entirely personal opinion, this leaves two directions: more
> volunteers or less projects. In the extreme, some would read this as a
> reason to close the gates to new projects until we have proven
> capacity.
>
Is there any chance t
If you model the IPMC as a group of volunteers who have collectively
volunteered to mentor and supervise new projects, then the current
situation strongly suggests that we have either too many projects or
not enough volunteers. Calling people 'lazy' has rarely been observed
to get them to do more w
For argument's sake, let's say "two". That is the specified/recommended
minimum. Thus, the IPMC must contribute an additional +1. Thus, it can
totally block podling releases thru its laziness and inactivity.
Sounds broken.
-g
On Jan 23, 2013 5:22 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
> How many active mento
