That page is part of the
Apache CMS and ASF members can edit that page by using the following
http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html#usage. Non ASF members can create a
ticket within jira under the infra project and attach a patch for the
changes they would like to make.
The repo and file you are
Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>+infra
>
>Ping! I would really like this annoyance to be resolved one way or the
>other.
>Could somebody more experienced with Apache web properties answer
>the question?
>
>
>> Question: how do we go about dis
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 03:05:15 +0100
From: Roman Shaposhnik
To: general@incubator.apache.org, infrastruct...@apache.org
Subject: Re: Formats of SHA/MD5 checksums
Sender: shaposh...@gmail.com
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Releases and new committers are pretty much the only time I'd expect to see
> votes in an Apache community.
Understood. My question was specifically about the
process used by ASF to manage its "top level" web
pages. Now I know.
Thanks,
Roma
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Henk P. Penning wrote:
> I am +1 on suggesting (on that page) a 'normal' form for
> the content of a .md5 file.
I'll take a crack at it now that I know where the source is ;-)
> I am definitedly -1 on removing the gpg line above, or
> suggesting that only
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 07:25:54 +0200:
> Jake Farrell wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 22:02:16 -0500:
> > That page is part of the Apache CMS and ASF members can edit that page
> > by using the following http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html#usage. Non ASF
> > members can create
Jake Farrell wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 22:02:16 -0500:
> That page is part of the Apache CMS and ASF members can edit that page
> by using the following http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html#usage. Non ASF
> members can create a ticket within jira under the infra project and
> attach a patch
Henk P. Penning wrote on Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:08:33 +0100:
> The reason given "I ended up writing a Perl script" doesn't
> make sense ; .md5 files come in many forms but the algorithm
> to verify is the same for all of them (there are no 'variations.') :
>
> verify (checksum md5, .md5-
Roman Shaposhnik wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 18:05:15 -0800:
> +infra
>
> Ping! I would really like this annoyance to be resolved one way or the other.
> Could somebody more experienced with Apache web properties answer
> the question?
>
> ===
Hi,
> I think that would be a fine choice. I'm fine with releasing it as is for
> now
> +1 (binding).
>
Thanks! Could you post your vote to the formal release thread as well?
>
> That said -- I'd like to see the next release take into account the
> feedback
> that has been provided to the proje
On Nov 30, 2012, at 3:03 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Alexander Broekhuis
> wrote:
>> I am fine with a change of the format. But at the moment we (Celix) still
>> have a pending release. Seeing that many other project use different
>> formats, I personally don'
+infra
Ping! I would really like this annoyance to be resolved one way or the other.
Could somebody more experienced with Apache web properties answer
the question?
> Question: how do we go about discouraging it then? Do we need a vote
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Alexander Broekhuis
wrote:
> I am fine with a change of the format. But at the moment we (Celix) still
> have a pending release. Seeing that many other project use different
> formats, I personally don't see this as a show stopper for our current
> release..
>
> C
Hi all,
>
> Question: how do we go about discouraging it then? Do we need a vote
> to modify the content of:
>http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing#md5
>
>
I am fine with a change of the format. But at the moment we (Celix) still
have a pending release. Seeing that many other project use d
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:50 PM, sebb wrote:
>> Personally, I find it difficult to verify the GPG generated checksums.
>
> Ditto. It's particularly awkward when the hash is wrapped over several lines.
>
> I ended up writing a Perl script to handle all the variations.
>
>> If I'm not alone perhaps
On 20 November 2012 23:22, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:51 PM, sebb wrote:
>> (Though installing it just for hash creation may be overkill).
>>
>> Maven generates hashes which are easy to check.
>> It's easy to use Ant to generate hashes in a suitable format.
>
> And this i
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:51 PM, sebb wrote:
> (Though installing it just for hash creation may be overkill).
>
> Maven generates hashes which are easy to check.
> It's easy to use Ant to generate hashes in a suitable format.
And this is the crux of the question -- what IS suitable format?
Perso
On 20 November 2012 21:20, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> while reviewing Celix RC I came across a peculiar format
>> for the SHA/MD5 checksums which I've never seen before:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubato
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> while reviewing Celix RC I came across a peculiar format
> for the SHA/MD5 checksums which I've never seen before:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/celix/celix-0.0.1-incubating/
>
> Turns out, this is the
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> What does gpg --verify do?
>
> http://www.gnupg.org/download/integrity_check.en.html
It verifies the GPG sig (as it should). I wasn't able to
find (well, by spending 2 minutes searching through
the man page on my Linux) an easy way to ask it
What does gpg --verify do?
http://www.gnupg.org/download/integrity_check.en.html
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Turns out, this is the output of gpg and it seems that
> there's no way to ask gpg to verify it (unlike -c for md5sum lets
> say). Worse yet, because of t
Hi all,
> while reviewing Celix RC I came across a peculiar format
> for the SHA/MD5 checksums which I've never seen before:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/celix/celix-0.0.1-incubating/
There are several other projects who do use the same tools. Cloudstack even
list on the
Hi!
while reviewing Celix RC I came across a peculiar format
for the SHA/MD5 checksums which I've never seen before:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/celix/celix-0.0.1-incubating/
Turns out, this is the output of gpg and it seems that
there's no way to ask gpg to verify it (u
23 matches
Mail list logo
