Hi
To have a better overview how the different project are supposed to be
different I've started a wiki-page to compare the features:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SemanticComparison#preview
At the current state it is in no way objective, but to me it would help to
see what is most likely to
Hi all,
2010/11/3 Bertrand Delacretaz
>
> What we need IMO is distinct focused projects, and probably a
> "semantic commons" project - or just a shared SVN area managed by one
> of the semantic projects. That project is then free to give commit
> access to that area to a larger set of committers
It is correct that Jena will be submitting a proposal to the Incubator. I have
the proposal now and I'm just waiting for their go-ahead to submit it. I guess
it being on their public lists indicates that will come any day now.
Sent from my mobile device.
On 3 Nov 2010, at 06:31, Bertrand Delac
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:27 AM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
> I think that Clerezza and "Foo" can work together in one top-level project...
I think distinct collaborating projects will be more efficient.
> ...I have seen that the Jena project also decided "to take Jena into the
> incubator":
>
I think that Clerezza and "Foo" can work together in one top-level project.
I have seen that the Jena project also decided "to take Jena into the
incubator":
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=4CD0127C.8090105%40epimorphics.com
Maybe the time is ripe for a united Apache Seman
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 02.11.2010, 08:17 +0100 schrieb Reto Bachmann-Gmuer:
> > IMO the best is to view Clerezza and FOO as sister projects, with
> lots
> > of exchanges between their communities and a sizable chunk of common
> > software components, but different end goals and audiences. This
> wil
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer
> wrote:
> > ...The goal of the FOO proposal ("a modular software stack and reusable
> set of
> > components for semantic content management") seems quite similar to the
> o
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote:
> ...The goal of the FOO proposal ("a modular software stack and reusable set of
> components for semantic content management") seems quite similar to the one
> of Clerezza ("an OSGi-based modular application and set of components
>
(restarting thread with general@incubator.apache.org hoping for a broader
discussion)
Hello
The goal of the FOO proposal ("a modular software stack and reusable set of
components for semantic content management") seems quite similar to the one
of Clerezza ("an OSGi-based modular application and s
