On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 4:56 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 10:04 AM Greg Stein wrote:
> > ...So, rather than OBSOLETE, or multiple README, I advocate a single
> top-level
> > README that details the deletions/reasons. Then just do an svn rm...
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 10:04 AM Greg Stein wrote:
> ...So, rather than OBSOLETE, or multiple README, I advocate a single top-level
> README that details the deletions/reasons. Then just do an svn rm...
Works for me, the idea of OBSOLETE is to make it obvious that stuff
has been deactivated but a
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:12 AM Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 7:37 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
> > ...I’ve been reviewing the incubator’s svn repository. In order to avoid
> confusion I am going to
> > add README.txt files to directories
Hi Dave,
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 7:37 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
> ...I’ve been reviewing the incubator’s svn repository. In order to avoid
> confusion I am going to
> add README.txt files to directories (eg. [1]) which are now obsolete, but not
> obviously so
How about moving them under an OBS
Yes please, thank you!
I asked about this a few weeks ago as this had me very confused!
<
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/42cd652f4621d55d5de51c5e84b39c1677ef92310e6f626a3b794574@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
>
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 7:37 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I’ve been re
Hi -
I’ve been reviewing the incubator’s svn repository. In order to avoid confusion
I am going to add README.txt files to directories (eg. [1]) which are now
obsolete, but not obviously so.
I’ve been doing so since there is no documentation on maintaining the
content/podling/${podling}.yml fi
