Re: Call to follow procedure

2003-08-08 Thread Tim Urberg
The core developers of the OpenEJB team and I sent in CLA's, but we're not an official committers (David Blevins asked us to so, probably because of our work on OpenEJB). We're not sure what that means, but we've done it. :) Tim Urberg (speaking for the OpenEJB team) Greg Stein wrote: On Wed,

Call to follow procedure

2003-08-08 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Given the legal uncertainties related to our J2EE project, allow me to suggest that the committers to this project be required to send a duly signed copy of the contributor agreement to our Secretary. This is nothing but standard ASF procedure and it could not do harm to follow our own procedur

Re: Call to follow procedure

2003-08-07 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 05:15:37PM +0200, Ceki Gülcü wrote: > > Given the legal uncertainties related to our J2EE project, allow me to > suggest that the committers to this project be required to send a duly > signed copy of the contributor agreement to our Secretary. This is nothing > but stan

Re: Call to follow procedure

2003-08-06 Thread Andy Barnett
By "committers", does this mean the actual CVS committers, or anyone who just submits a patch to a mailing list that an actual CVS committer still is responsible for committing? ~Andy On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 10:15, Ceki Gülcü wrote: > Given the legal uncertainties related to our J2EE project, allow

Re: Call to follow procedure

2003-08-06 Thread Ceki Gülcü
The term "committers" refers to developers with commit access. At 10:26 AM 8/6/2003 -0500, Andy Barnett wrote: By "committers", does this mean the actual CVS committers, or anyone who just submits a patch to a mailing list that an actual CVS committer still is responsible for committing? ~Andy On