Hi,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> I'll see if I can come up with a patch with edits along the lines
> described above.
See [1] for a proposed patch, and [2] for the output.
My idea is to collect the points about the rationale of the guide up
into the introduction sect
On 30 January 2012 13:01, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
>> Hey Robert,
>
> Leo :-)
>
> (Great to hear from you again)
>
>> Thanks for this; it was obviously a lot of work!
>
> A parting gift to the Incubator :-)
As a parting gift to you then..
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Leo Simons wrote:
> Hey Robert,
Leo :-)
(Great to hear from you again)
> Thanks for this; it was obviously a lot of work!
A parting gift to the Incubator :-)
Robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hey Robert,
Thanks for this; it was obviously a lot of work! I like the word
picks, flow and style of this guide a lot. There's a lot to read here
and some new stuff to learn for me -- I confess I've been ignoring as
much about trademarks as I can until a time comes up when I actually
have a need
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote on Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:31:50 +:
>> Brand would be satisfied by - say - a profession trademark search
>
> [citation needed]
I'm not will to cite out of context. Please read all the archives.
Robert
--
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote on Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:33:38 +:
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Daniel Shahaf
>> wrote:
>> > Jukka Zitting wrote on Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 23:47:38 +0100:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 1
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote on Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:33:38 +:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > Jukka Zitting wrote on Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 23:47:38 +0100:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> >> wrote:
> >> > Please note
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote on Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:31:50 +:
> Brand would be satisfied by - say - a profession trademark search
[citation needed]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For addi
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Jukka Zitting wrote on Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 23:47:38 +0100:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
>> wrote:
>> > Please note that I didn't invent this process. I would have preferred
>> > something much simpler
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>> Please note that I didn't invent this process. I would have preferred
>> something much simpler. I just documented the recommendations of the
>> brand team.
>
> Was
Jukka Zitting wrote on Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 23:47:38 +0100:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
> > Please note that I didn't invent this process. I would have preferred
> > something much simpler. I just documented the recommendations of the
> > brand team.
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> Please note that I didn't invent this process. I would have preferred
> something much simpler. I just documented the recommendations of the
> brand team.
Was this a recommendation or a requirement? I.e. are we talking about
MU
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>> The status quo is that podlings must check that their name is suitable
>> before graduation.
>
> The wording of the incubator policy on this is to "check of project
>
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> The status quo is that podlings must check that their name is suitable
> before graduation.
The wording of the incubator policy on this is to "check of project
name for trademark issues" [1], which I think is fine.
The exact wa
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>> The new documentation describing in more detail one way to check the
>> suitability of the proposed name is just about ready for public review
>
> The URL is http://
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> The new documentation describing in more detail one way to check the
> suitability of the proposed name is just about ready for public review
The URL is http://incubator.apache.org/guides/names.html
> It's fine to just dive in
The new documentation describing in more detail one way to check the
suitability of the proposed name is just about ready for public review
(at least, once the mirrors have sync'd)
The aim is to be able to replace the outdated task in the status
template with a link to good documentation consist w
17 matches
Mail list logo
