Re: [geronimo] Core Service Framework (Was: RE: Names & Projects)

2003-08-14 Thread Tim Urberg
> A J2EE container is a little different from an Avalon container. Avalon > is a generic service/component framework. The core Geronimo container > is an optimised J2EE container developed from a great deal of > experience and use of JBoss, OpenEJB & mx4j. Its particularly geared > towards EJB

Re: [geronimo] Core Service Framework (Was: RE: Names & Projects)

2003-08-14 Thread James Strachan
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 05:55 pm, Tim Urberg wrote: A J2EE container is a little different from an Avalon container. Avalon is a generic service/component framework. The core Geronimo container is an optimised J2EE container developed from a great deal of experience and use of JBoss, Op

Re: [geronimo] Core Service Framework (Was: RE: Names & Projects)

2003-08-14 Thread J Aaron Farr
Quoting James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > To be certified Geronimo needs to fully support JMX. So the current > plan is to follow the Tomcat 5 & JBoss ideas to use MBeans to register > & wire the services together. Whatever component model or libraries a > particular service wishes to u

Re: [geronimo] Core Service Framework (Was: RE: Names & Projects)

2003-08-14 Thread James Strachan
Maybe a quicker answer to this thread is - the core Geronimo container is an EJB / MDB container which supports pluggable services via JMX. Thats quite different to the scope of Avalon. (Can you tell I've given up caffeine recently - my brains still a bit fuzzy today :) On Wednesday, August 6

Re: [geronimo] Core Service Framework (Was: RE: Names & Projects)

2003-08-14 Thread James Strachan
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 04:10 pm, J Aaron Farr wrote: -Original Message- From: Aaron Mulder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:21 PM On the project front, am I correct that the goal is to integrate other projects wherever possible and only build

[geronimo] Core Service Framework (Was: RE: Names & Projects)

2003-08-10 Thread Farr, Aaron
> -Original Message- > From: Aaron Mulder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:21 PM > > On the project front, am I correct that the goal is to integrate > other projects wherever possible and only build when strictly necessary? > If there is going to be

Re: [geronimo] Core Service Framework (Was: RE: Names & Projects)

2003-08-09 Thread James Strachan
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 05:18 pm, J Aaron Farr wrote: Quoting James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 04:34 pm, J Aaron Farr wrote: Quoting James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: To be certified Geronimo needs to fully support JMX. So the current plan is to

[geronimo] Core Service Framework (Was: RE: Names & Projects)

2003-08-06 Thread J Aaron Farr
> -Original Message- > From: Aaron Mulder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:21 PM > > On the project front, am I correct that the goal is to integrate > other projects wherever possible and only build when strictly > necessary? If there is going to be b

Re: [geronimo] Core Service Framework (Was: RE: Names & Projects)

2003-08-06 Thread J Aaron Farr
Quoting James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 04:34 pm, J Aaron Farr wrote: > > > Quoting James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >> To be certified Geronimo needs to fully support JMX. So the current > >> plan is to follow the Tomcat 5 & JBoss ideas to use

Re: [geronimo] Core Service Framework (Was: RE: Names & Projects)

2003-08-06 Thread James Strachan
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 04:34 pm, J Aaron Farr wrote: Quoting James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: To be certified Geronimo needs to fully support JMX. So the current plan is to follow the Tomcat 5 & JBoss ideas to use MBeans to register & wire the services together. Whatever component mo