Re: [VOTE] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4

2016-02-08 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> Well, that's the problem -- the source doesn't have it. > > It should as the first couple of line of the BSD license header are like so > (from a file I happen to be looking at at this instance): > > /* > * Copyright (c) 2015, Nordic

Re: [VOTE] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4

2016-02-04 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Well, that's the problem -- the source doesn't have it. It should as the first couple of line of the BSD license header are like so (from a file I happen to be looking at at this instance): /* * Copyright (c) 2015, Nordic Semiconductor ASA * All rights reserved. * * Redistribution and

Re: [VOTE] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4

2016-02-04 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> I mean the BSD license makes you advertise the Copyright Notice and there's >> a better >> chance of it going downstream via NOTICE. > > The source file will have the header which contains the copyright notice so > it will still be

Re: [VOTE] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4

2016-02-04 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I mean the BSD license makes you advertise the Copyright Notice and there's a > better > chance of it going downstream via NOTICE. The source file will have the header which contains the copyright notice so it will still be there, perhaps just not as obvious unless it listed in license.

Re: [VOTE] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4

2016-02-04 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> can you please take a look at this and see if that's acceptable: >> https://github.com/rvs/incubator-hawq/blob/master/LICENSE >> https://github.com/rvs/incubator-hawq/blob/master/NOTICE >>

Re: [VOTE] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4

2016-02-03 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > can you please take a look at this and see if that's acceptable: > https://github.com/rvs/incubator-hawq/blob/master/LICENSE > https://github.com/rvs/incubator-hawq/blob/master/NOTICE > Quick look looks much better but I’ve not

Re: [VOTE] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4

2016-02-03 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 7:00 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > So should we cancel this vote and wait for a new RC? Yup. Thanks, Roman. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4

2016-02-03 Thread John D. Ament
So should we cancel this vote and wait for a new RC? On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:56 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Justin, > > once again -- thank you so much for your diligent reviews! Wrt. > NOTICE/LICENSE files > can you please take a look at this and see if that's acceptable: >https://github.

Re: [VOTE] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4

2016-02-03 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
Justin, once again -- thank you so much for your diligent reviews! Wrt. NOTICE/LICENSE files can you please take a look at this and see if that's acceptable: https://github.com/rvs/incubator-hawq/blob/master/LICENSE https://github.com/rvs/incubator-hawq/blob/master/NOTICE Wrt. crypto code -

Re: [VOTE] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4

2016-01-27 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I think this section of NOTICE is simply not worded well enough. No problem, if it is not bundled it should be removed, if the wording is wrong it should be fixed. > Not it doesn’t. You might want to double check the files in here: ./contrib/pgcrypto ./src/interfaces/libpq Just do a qui

Re: [VOTE] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4

2016-01-27 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > -1 binding until license and crypto issues are cleared up. Justin, thanks for your quick review -- you're awesome, man! Still I have a few questions/comments ;-) > I notice the NOTICE mentions "Classpath Exception to the GPL” this

[Vote] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4

2016-01-27 Thread Ting(Goden) Yao
Incubator PMC, The Apache HAWQ (incubating) community has voted on and approved the proposal to release Apache HAWQ 2.0.0-beta (incubating). The voting result is available at: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-hawq-dev/201601.mbox/%3CCAB0yre=7VHcR-DYrOZxfRg159XBnE2u=jdyvmacapgouy5

Re: [VOTE] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4

2016-01-26 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, -1 binding until license and crypto issues are cleared up. I notice the NOTICE mentions "Classpath Exception to the GPL” this is Category X and can’t be included in an release. See http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x This release also looks to contain crypto software - has

Re: [VOTE] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4

2016-01-26 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Ting(Goden) Yao wrote: > (I was told this email wasn't received by the mailing list so resending it) > > Incubator PMC, > > The Apache HAWQ (incubating) community has voted on and > approved the proposal to release Apache HAWQ 2.0.0-beta (incubating). > The voting

[VOTE] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4

2016-01-26 Thread Ting(Goden) Yao
(I was told this email wasn't received by the mailing list so resending it) Incubator PMC, The Apache HAWQ (incubating) community has voted on and approved the proposal to release Apache HAWQ 2.0.0-beta (incubating). The voting result is available at: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incu